Cincinnati, OH - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | ||
1 | CANDREVA Greta H. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% | ||||||
2 | HOLMES Katharine (Kat) W. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 64% | ||||||
3 | BASSA Francesca A. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 4% | ||||||
3 | VERMEULE Emily | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 16% | ||||||
5 | MANGANO Ariana J. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% | ||||||
6 | VAN BRUMMEN Anna C. | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 41% | 17% | 2% | ||||||
7 | KOPECKY Lydia J. | - | 1% | 6% | 18% | 33% | 31% | 12% | ||||||
8 | PIRKOWSKI Amanda L. | - | - | - | 4% | 17% | 41% | 38% | ||||||
9 | NIXON Catherine (Kasia) D. | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 31% | 63% | ||||||
10 | CONSTANTINO Lola | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% | ||||||
11 | ZUIKOVA Veronika | - | - | 2% | 8% | 17% | 24% | 23% | 15% | 7% | 2% | - | - | - |
12 | KHAMIS Yasmine A. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% | ||||||
13 | HUSISIAN Hadley N. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% | ||||||
14 | ENO Megan E. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 36% | 16% | ||||||
15 | SIRICO Amanda E. | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 5% | ||||||
16 | KUNJAN Lena R. | 2% | 11% | 24% | 29% | 21% | 9% | 3% | 1% | - | - | - | - | - |
17 | BEDDINGFIELD Claire E. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% | ||||||
18 | WASHINGTON Isis | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% | ||||||
19 | VIE Natalie J. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% | ||||||
20 | NIXON Caroline (Karolina) L. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% | ||||||
21 | CHIMAHUSKY Rebecca | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% | ||||||
22 | DUNLAP-SMITH Azaline I. | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% | ||||||
23 | MO Victoria | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% | ||||||
24 | SHEFFIELD Lake Mawu | 1% | 6% | 19% | 31% | 28% | 13% | 2% | ||||||
25 | BATES Cassandra L. | 1% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - | ||||||
26 | PAUL Anna L. | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% | ||||||
27 | MCFADDEN Christa M. | - | 3% | 12% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 5% | ||||||
28 | GRADY Miriam A. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% | ||||||
29 | BARNA Isabella | - | - | - | 2% | 7% | 16% | 23% | 24% | 17% | 8% | 2% | - | - |
30 | RAUSCH Ariana (Ari) M. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | ||||||
31 | KHROL Jaclyn | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% | ||||||
32 | PARK Faith K. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 4% | ||||||
33 | LIANG Rui ( Jessica ) | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% | ||||||
34 | LIU Kai (Charlene) | - | - | - | - | - | 2% | 6% | 15% | 24% | 26% | 18% | 7% | 1% |
35 | GUZZI VINCENTI Margherita A. | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% | ||||||
36 | GIFFORD Emily R. | - | - | - | - | - | 2% | 8% | 18% | 28% | 27% | 14% | 3% | |
37 | KIM Diane E. | - | 1% | 4% | 12% | 22% | 25% | 20% | 10% | 4% | 1% | - | - | |
38 | YEFREMENKO Dariya (Dasha) (Dasha) | - | - | - | - | 1% | 3% | 9% | 17% | 24% | 24% | 15% | 6% | 1% |
39 | STEWART Tatijana I. | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | ||||||
40 | DANIEL Chloe L. | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 5% | ||||||
41 | TANIBAJEVA Rachel L. | - | - | - | 1% | 4% | 12% | 22% | 27% | 21% | 10% | 3% | - | |
42 | CHOI Lyla | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% | ||||||
43 | DOLGONOS Melanie | - | - | 1% | 4% | 12% | 20% | 25% | 21% | 12% | 4% | 1% | - | - |
44 | BOYS Nishta B. | - | - | - | 2% | 7% | 16% | 23% | 24% | 17% | 8% | 2% | - | - |
45 | TYLER Syd | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% | ||||||
46 | LURYE Sarah | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% | ||||||
46 | PROCTOR Sara J. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 6% | - | ||||||
49 | VERRET Alexanne | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 5% | - | ||||||
50 | PLENTY Kenyata (Kenya) (Kenya) G. | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - | ||||||
51 | PYO Yunice | - | - | 1% | 3% | 9% | 17% | 23% | 22% | 16% | 7% | 2% | - | - |
52 | CEBULA Anne | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - | ||||||
53 | MARTUS Cosima O. | - | - | 1% | 3% | 9% | 19% | 26% | 23% | 13% | 5% | 1% | - | |
54 | HUELLAS-BRUSKIEWICZ Marie-Rose R. | - | - | 1% | 3% | 10% | 19% | 25% | 22% | 14% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
55 | YEU Irene | - | - | - | - | - | 2% | 8% | 19% | 28% | 26% | 13% | 3% | - |
56 | BROOKS Tean R. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% | ||||||
57 | KOMAR Sofia | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | ||||||
58 | PHILLIPS Summer E. | 5% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | ||||||
59 | ADRAGNA Olivia | - | 2% | 8% | 18% | 25% | 23% | 15% | 7% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
60 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | - | - | 2% | 7% | 18% | 28% | 25% | 14% | 5% | 1% | - | - | |
61 | YAMANAKA Mina | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% | ||||||
62 | QUINLAN Nicole P. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 6% | - | ||||||
63 | MARSH Janet L. | 10% | 26% | 31% | 21% | 9% | 3% | 1% | - | - | - | - | - | - |
64 | CAMPBELL Anahit M. | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - | ||||||
65 | JOYCE Michaela | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 28% | ||||||
66 | LIN Jessica Y. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% | ||||||
67 | WEISS Talia L. | - | - | 2% | 6% | 15% | 23% | 25% | 18% | 9% | 3% | - | - | |
68 | SCALA Emma | 2% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | ||||||
69 | PAPADOPOULOS Maria | - | 1% | 6% | 15% | 24% | 25% | 18% | 8% | 3% | - | - | - | |
70 | BARRY Julia E. | - | - | - | - | - | 2% | 8% | 19% | 28% | 26% | 13% | 3% | |
71 | LAWSON Marie A. | - | 1% | 6% | 16% | 26% | 25% | 16% | 7% | 2% | - | - | - | |
72 | ANGEN Katie R. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% | ||||||
73 | TOBY Natalia R. | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | ||||||
74 | BUVARP Elisabeth M. | - | - | 1% | 3% | 9% | 18% | 25% | 24% | 15% | 6% | 1% | - | |
75 | VAN MARION Kirsten C. | - | - | 2% | 8% | 17% | 24% | 24% | 16% | 7% | 2% | - | - | |
76 | HABERKERN Kundry E. | 3% | 12% | 24% | 28% | 20% | 10% | 3% | 1% | - | - | - | - | |
77 | TONCHEVA Victoria M. | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% | ||||||
77 | DORVAL Anne-Marie | - | - | - | 2% | 6% | 14% | 23% | 25% | 19% | 9% | 3% | - | - |
79 | LANZMAN Anna B. | 5% | 35% | 38% | 17% | 4% | - | - | ||||||
80 | LEUNG Karina Kay Sze | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 2% | ||||||
81 | MONTOYA Kimberlee C. | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% | 1% | ||||||
82 | CHERRY Ashley A. | - | 2% | 7% | 16% | 24% | 24% | 16% | 7% | 2% | - | - | - | |
83 | ROBLES Elena | - | 1% | 6% | 14% | 23% | 25% | 18% | 9% | 3% | 1% | - | - | - |
84 | LIM Clarice | - | - | 2% | 7% | 16% | 23% | 24% | 17% | 8% | 3% | 1% | - | - |
84 | ZAFFT Tatiana M. | - | 1% | 4% | 12% | 21% | 25% | 21% | 12% | 4% | 1% | - | - | |
86 | LEE Michelle | - | - | 2% | 8% | 18% | 24% | 23% | 15% | 6% | 2% | - | - | - |
87 | O'REILLY Aeryn E. | - | 1% | 4% | 12% | 21% | 25% | 20% | 11% | 4% | 1% | - | - | - |
88 | DESAMOURS Sabine I. | - | - | 1% | 4% | 10% | 20% | 25% | 22% | 13% | 5% | 1% | - | |
89 | GAO Emily L. | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% | ||||||
90 | CHU Audrey | - | - | 2% | 6% | 14% | 22% | 24% | 18% | 10% | 3% | 1% | - | - |
91 | LONG Cindy | - | - | - | 1% | 4% | 11% | 21% | 26% | 22% | 11% | 3% | - | |
92 | KANG Dahyun | - | 2% | 11% | 26% | 30% | 20% | 8% | 2% | - | - | - | - | |
93 | DAVIS Sophie R. | 1% | 8% | 19% | 26% | 23% | 14% | 6% | 2% | - | - | - | - | - |
93 | VANDERLINDEN Mira | 9% | 25% | 31% | 22% | 10% | 3% | 1% | - | - | - | - | - | - |
95 | RABEL Brenna V. | 1% | 6% | 16% | 26% | 26% | 16% | 7% | 2% | - | - | - | - | |
96 | BELAOUSSOFF Kira | - | 2% | 9% | 20% | 27% | 23% | 13% | 5% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
96 | SHAMSIAN Shaya | 4% | 31% | 40% | 20% | 5% | - | - | ||||||
98 | CHIMIENTI Michele | - | 3% | 12% | 24% | 28% | 20% | 9% | 3% | - | - | - | - | - |
98 | BARR Abigail D. | - | 1% | 4% | 12% | 22% | 25% | 20% | 10% | 4% | 1% | - | - | - |
100 | BINDAS Blodwen S. | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - | ||||||
101 | TAPIA Sandy | - | 1% | 4% | 13% | 23% | 26% | 20% | 10% | 3% | 1% | - | - | |
101 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | - | 2% | 7% | 19% | 28% | 25% | 14% | 5% | 1% | - | - | - | |
103 | PROVENZA Hannah G. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 3% | 10% | 23% | 30% | 23% | 9% | 1% | |
104 | OXENREIDER Tierna A. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 39% | 36% | 5% | ||||||
105 | KULKARNI Diya | - | - | - | 2% | 8% | 16% | 24% | 24% | 16% | 7% | 2% | - | - |
106 | IGOE Nirali B. | - | 3% | 11% | 22% | 26% | 21% | 11% | 4% | 1% | - | - | - | |
107 | GILLIS Alexandra G. | 6% | 22% | 32% | 25% | 11% | 3% | 1% | - | - | - | - | - | |
108 | O'REILLY Meghan J. | - | 1% | 4% | 14% | 24% | 26% | 19% | 9% | 3% | 1% | - | - | |
109 | SZPAK Lara K. | - | 2% | 8% | 19% | 26% | 23% | 14% | 5% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
110 | WALLACE Katherine C. | - | - | - | 1% | 5% | 13% | 21% | 24% | 19% | 10% | 4% | 1% | - |
110 | LIN Katie Y. | - | - | 1% | 3% | 9% | 18% | 25% | 22% | 14% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
112 | PROVANCE Allison N. | 21% | 38% | 27% | 11% | 3% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
113 | BOTNER Olivia | - | 3% | 11% | 21% | 26% | 21% | 12% | 5% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
114 | KIM Natalie S. | 21% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - | ||||||
115 | PROVANCE Amanda R. | - | 2% | 8% | 18% | 26% | 24% | 15% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - | |
116 | BRILL Sophie | - | - | - | 2% | 8% | 18% | 26% | 24% | 15% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
117 | ADVINCULA Anabella E. | 6% | 21% | 29% | 24% | 13% | 5% | 1% | - | - | - | - | - | - |
118 | MORGAN Elizabeth (Ella) R. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 13% | 22% | 24% | 19% | 10% | 4% | 1% | - | |
118 | LAMBERT Jasmine M. | 2% | 10% | 22% | 27% | 22% | 12% | 4% | 1% | - | - | - | - | - |
120 | BEITTEL Chloe F. | - | - | - | < 1% | 1% | 5% | 14% | 25% | 28% | 19% | 7% | 1% | |
121 | ALLEN Susan B. | - | 2% | 8% | 17% | 24% | 23% | 15% | 7% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
122 | KAIN Isabel J. | 2% | 10% | 25% | 32% | 22% | 8% | 1% | ||||||
123 | LEIGHTON Eleanor T. | 5% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - | ||||||
123 | GUPTA Ananya B. | 1% | 5% | 15% | 25% | 25% | 17% | 8% | 3% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
123 | CAO Catherine H. | - | 1% | 6% | 15% | 24% | 25% | 18% | 8% | 3% | 1% | - | - | |
126 | PRASAD Anagha | 9% | 26% | 31% | 21% | 9% | 3% | 1% | - | - | - | - | - | |
127 | YAO Jillian | < 1% | 3% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.