USA Fencing National Championships & July Challenge

Veteran 40-49 Men’s Epee (V40ME)

Wednesday, July 6, 2022 at 2:00 PM

Register

Minneapolis, MN

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 3436 3579 - 3276
5 - 8 3328 3657 - 3170
9 - 16 2548 2800 - 2231
17 - 26 2009 2256 - 1523

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Maczik, Adam Marx Fencing Academy A21 3563 3279.93
2 Lichten, Keith East Bay Fencers Gym A21 3579 3224.59
3 Makmatov, Vadim Salle Auriol Seattle A22 3326 3045.67
4 Zucker, Noah Cobra Fencing Club LLC A22 3276 2993.31
5 Rostal, Scott Twin Cities Fencing Club A22 3272 2929.39
6 Bartlett, Jonathan New York Athletic Club A22 3213 2904.34
7 Allen, Graham East Bay Fencers Gym A22 3170 2831.09
8 ElDarawani, Yasser Kaizen Academy LLC B22 3657 2751.90
9 Cheng, Thomas Stoccata Fencing Academy & Club B22 2799 2519.54
10 Yao, Shun True Focus Sports Academy A19 2800 2472.11
11 Springer, Michael Olympia Fencing Center A22 2645 2379.92
12 Stock, Jordan Salle Auriol Seattle B22 2414 2142.09
13 Gauvey, Ken DC Fencers Club E22 2528 2107.49
14 Hillstrom, Nathan Cabrillo Academy Of The Sword LLC B22 2248 1931.87
15 Gersen, Jacob Olympia Fencing Center D22 2231 1923.79
16 Iorio, Matthew Ocean State Fencing Club U 2722 1904.35
17 Kent, David Rocky Mountain Fencing Academy C22 2114 1768.90
18 Harrell, D. Fox Marx Fencing Academy C21 2256 1748.17
19 Ozanne, Jeffrey Twin Cities Fencing Club D22 2114 1706.95
20 Kim, Jeff Elite Fencing Academy (GA) E22 2037 1686.87
21 Chiz, Max New Orleans Fencers Club C19 2155 1674.43
22 Lin, Kimball Maximum Fencing Club D21 2175 1633.33
23 Santos, Felipe Olympia Fencing Center C21 1854 1525.44
24 Ferriere, Thomas Fortune Fencing U 2010 1483.31
25 Rhea, Eric Central Iowa Fencing Academy D19 1852 1298.79
26 Kuo, Michael Las Positas Fencing Center U 1523 1040.94

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!