USA Fencing National Championships & July Challenge

Veteran 40-49 Men’s Epee (V40ME)

Wednesday, July 6, 2022 at 2:00 PM

Register

Minneapolis, MN

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 3436 3589 - 3276
5 - 8 3322 3657 - 3170
9 - 16 2548 2801 - 2251
17 - 26 2002 2256 - 1492

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Maczik, Adam Marx Fencing Academy A21 3573 3294.91
2 Lichten, Keith East Bay Fencers Gym A21 3589 3246.22
3 Makmatov, Vadim Salle Auriol Seattle A22 3307 3033.28
4 Zucker, Noah Cobra Fencing Club LLC A22 3276 2997.66
5 Rostal, Scott Twin Cities Fencing Club A22 3272 2929.39
6 Bartlett, Jonathan New York Athletic Club A22 3187 2880.61
7 Allen, Graham East Bay Fencers Gym A22 3170 2831.09
8 ElDarawani, Yasser Kaizen Academy LLC B22 3657 2751.90
9 Cheng, Thomas Stoccata Fencing Academy & Club B22 2801 2528.26
10 Yao, Shun True Focus Sports Academy A19 2765 2442.02
11 Springer, Michael Olympia Fencing Center A22 2644 2379.76
12 Stock, Jordan Salle Auriol Seattle B22 2411 2141.43
13 Gauvey, Ken DC Fencers Club E22 2470 2061.90
14 Gersen, Jacob Olympia Fencing Center D22 2319 2019.42
15 Hillstrom, Nathan Cabrillo Academy Of The Sword LLC B22 2251 1944.24
16 Iorio, Matthew Ocean State Fencing Club U 2722 1904.35
17 Kent, David Rocky Mountain Fencing Academy C22 2114 1768.90
18 Harrell, D. Fox Marx Fencing Academy C21 2256 1748.17
19 Ozanne, Jeffrey Twin Cities Fencing Club D22 2114 1706.95
20 Kim, Jeff Elite Fencing Academy (GA) E22 2039 1701.86
21 Chiz, Max New Orleans Fencers Club C19 2155 1674.43
22 Lin, Kimball Maximum Fencing Club D21 2175 1633.33
23 Ferriere, Thomas Fortune Fencing U 2025 1514.76
24 Santos, Felipe Olympia Fencing Center C21 1802 1481.86
25 Rhea, Eric Central Iowa Fencing Academy D19 1852 1298.79
26 Kuo, Michael Las Positas Fencing Center U 1492 1015.59

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!