Livingston, NJ - Livingston, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | ||
| 1 | WOODS Jack H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 96% | 86% | 64% | 34% | 9% |
| 2 | JOHNSON Aidan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 96% | 90% | 75% | 54% | 30% | 11% | 3% | - |
| 3 | LOCKWOOD Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 98% | 93% | 84% | 67% | 45% | 24% | 10% | 3% | - | - | |
| 4 | MONTALVO-ZOTTER Gabriel M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 94% | 84% | 69% | 48% | 28% | 13% | 5% | 1% | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 5 | GOGUEN-COMPAGNONI Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 95% | 86% | 71% | 52% | 32% | 16% | 6% | 2% | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 6 | GUPTA Varun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 97% | 91% | 79% | 61% | 41% | 23% | 10% | 4% | 1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 7 | HU Robin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 97% | 91% | 78% | 60% | 40% | 22% | 10% | 3% | 1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 8 | DESOLA Aidan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 97% | 92% | 80% | 61% | 41% | 22% | 10% | 4% | 1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 9 | HERGERT Benito | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 84% | 64% | 37% | 15% | 4% | - | ||||||||
| 10 | ORR Aidan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 92% | 75% | 48% | 23% | 8% | 2% | - | - | - | - | ||||||||
| 11 | DEEB Adam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 77% | 53% | 27% | 10% | 3% | - | - | - | - | ||||||||
| 13 | PARK Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 92% | 77% | 53% | 28% | 10% | 3% | - | - | - | ||||||||
| 14 | MUNDAHL Brandon D. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 87% | 68% | 43% | 21% | 8% | 2% | - | - | - | - | ||||||||
| 15 | WU Wesley E. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | ||||||||||||||
| 16 | PYO Michael M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 7% | ||||||||||||||
| 18 | PICCININNI Lucas | 100% | 83% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | - | ||||||||||||||
| 19 | SUN Matthew | 100% | 87% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | - | ||||||||||||||
| 20 | BASAK Ashton R. | 100% | 57% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||
| 21 | PREFER Brenden | 100% | 61% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.