La Jolla, CA - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HADLER Benjamin N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 13% |
| 2 | SOHN Christopher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% | 57% | 16% | |
| 3 | KUNZ Bernard (Benny) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% | 13% |
| 3 | PARK Luke J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 39% | 8% | |
| 5 | DIVITO Dylan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% | |
| 6 | FARQUHARSON Cole | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
| 7 | LEVY Jacob M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 20% | 2% |
| 8 | ZENG Lucas H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 75% | |
| 9 | WONG Anthony M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
| 10 | SHERMAN Marco J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 41% |
| 11 | PAZ Ethan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 52% | 13% | 1% | |
| 12 | LEE Brandon B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 6% |
| 13 | FUNK Theo S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 39% | 8% | |
| 14 | KELLY William J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | 19% | |
| 15 | WHARTON Zachary | 100% | 71% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 16 | NGUYEN Nish | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 17 | CATLIN Adam | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% |
| 18 | FORTNER Lance R. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 45% | 6% | < 1% | |
| 19 | JEON Alexander E. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 8% | |
| 20 | CHAN Anthony | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 8% | |
| 21 | ARNOLD Oscar A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 75% | 41% | 11% |
| 22 | CHIN Jason Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 32% | 6% |
| 23 | FERNANDES Zain | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 24 | NGUYEN Jett | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 20% | 3% | |
| 25 | DARIANO Noah G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 34% | |
| 26 | LOMBARDI Leo | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 23% | 1% | |
| 27 | GIRALDO Pablo E. | 100% | 95% | 65% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 28 | OH Samuel H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 12% | |
| 29 | PAEK Alex J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 30 | JEON Nathan S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 7% |
| 31 | CHUNG Jinwoo | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% | |
| 32 | LAO Scott E. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% | |
| 33 | JAYASEKARA Hiran H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% |
| 34 | LA ROSA Federico | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 14% | |
| 35 | PROUTY Nicholas C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 13% |
| 36 | ZHENG Alan H. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 5% | |
| 37 | HEER Damanjit S. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 38 | CHOI Ethan L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% |
| 39 | KIM Aaron J. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 40 | CHENG Matthew S. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 41 | XIAO EDWARD | 100% | 89% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 42 | PHAM-CHANG Duke A. | 100% | 89% | 39% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | CAI Jason Zhicheng | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 44 | LAI Christopher W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 54% | |
| 45 | MOHAMED Yaseen | 100% | 74% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
| 46 | KIM Brandon J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 40% | 4% | |
| 47 | LUNA Emilio | 100% | 70% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 48 | HONG Daniel | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 8% | |
| 49 | BRAUNSCHWEIG Simon J. | 100% | 65% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 50 | SOMERS Sean | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
| 51 | KIM Isaiah G. | 100% | 89% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 52 | MORALES Ian N. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 61% | 20% | 2% | - |
| 53 | HO Justin | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 54 | CHAN Andrew M. | 100% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 55 | NAKAMURA Alexander B. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 56 | CLAY Jacob M. | 100% | 99% | 83% | 41% | 9% | - | |
| 57 | SCHENCK Theo | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 58 | SCHULZE-KALT Graydon L. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% | |
| 59 | BARTEL Jacob L. | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 60 | HSIUNG Richie | 100% | 92% | 28% | 4% | - | - | |
| 61 | WU Conrad J. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 61 | PATINO Yahir | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 63 | NAM Michael | 100% | 61% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 64 | MURATA Akitoshi D. | 100% | 84% | 36% | 4% | - | - | |
| 65 | SANTOS FINK Sage A. | 100% | 82% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 66 | SWEENEY Quinn | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 67 | JEFFERY Jakob | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 68 | WOMACH Tristan | 100% | 15% | - | - | - | - | |
| 69 | AVRON Case B. | 100% | 92% | 59% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 70 | SECONDO Nico | 100% | 62% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 71 | LI Ryan Z. | 100% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.