Music City Fencing Club - Nashville, TN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
| 1 | PLAISANCE Louis | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% |
| 2 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% | |
| 3 | TEITENBERG John F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 3 | GLASS Timothy C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 26% |
| 5 | WEISS Olivia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 67% | 33% | 8% |
| 6 | CAPELLUA Tommaso | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 4% | |
| 7 | SZOKOLAY Robert E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 21% | |
| 8 | JAMES Samuel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 2% | |
| 9 | BAKER Julian L. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 13% | 1% | |
| 10 | RUTHERFURD John (Trace) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 16% | |
| 11 | ARROWSMITH II Alan M. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 45% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 12 | JORDAN Jonathan ". | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
| 13 | WEIST Spencer | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 14 | KENT Dwain | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 2% | |
| 15 | SAUL Nicole | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 16 | DOELEMAN Zeno | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 17 | CHRISTIAN John R. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 18 | LIM Joshua | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 19 | CAPELLUA Mariasole | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 4% | |
| 20 | KURBEGOV Alexander R. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 21 | MOORE Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 22 | BURRUSS Aaron | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 53% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 23 | VALES Keyan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 19% | 2% | |
| 24 | BERNSTEIN Stuart E. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 25 | EDWARDS Darby | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 6% | - | - |
| 26 | ENDERLE Alexis N. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 45% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 27 | DORSETT Elizabeth | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 28 | SHARPE Jacob | 100% | 100% | 92% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 29 | GOEDICKE Elway | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 30 | ADIBZADEH Mehrdad | 100% | 98% | 80% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 31 | WILLIAMS Sophia | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 32 | HAYES Zackery | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | GRIMWOOD Donovan | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 47% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 34 | RICKMAN II Samuel B. | 100% | 65% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 35 | DILLARD Katlyn M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 36 | BRUSH Sydney | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 37 | YU Sheerea | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 38 | PRICE Wade | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 39 | DEWITT Sarah | 100% | 94% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 40 | STEINWACHS Mark | 100% | 98% | 83% | 52% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 41 | NEEL Callum | 100% | 95% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | TORRES Daisy | 100% | 87% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 43 | WERNER Sean T. | 100% | 83% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 44 | BALDWIN Mike | 100% | 97% | 82% | 53% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 44 | ALMUHAWAS Abdulmohsen | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 38% | 13% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.