Music City Fencing Club - Nashville, TN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | STANLEY Mason B. | - | - | 1% | 15% | 52% | 32% | |
2 | MITCHELL Philip D. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 41% | 14% |
3 | ZHAO Jason L. | - | - | 2% | 19% | 47% | 32% | |
3 | ANDREYENKA Yana | - | 9% | 34% | 41% | 16% | ||
5 | CHOUN Samuel Minwook | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% |
6 | LI Simon A. | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 4% |
7 | BURTE Alexander J. | - | - | - | 6% | 40% | 43% | 11% |
8 | ANDREYENKA Hanna | - | 2% | 19% | 41% | 31% | 8% | |
9 | DELAP Rylan Q. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 29% |
10 | BARLETTA Joseph | - | - | 2% | 23% | 50% | 24% | |
11 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | - | - | - | 11% | 46% | 43% | |
12 | STUTCHBURY Carolina J. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
13 | UPTON Craig | - | 1% | 14% | 47% | 31% | 6% | - |
14 | MEYERS Lee P. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 35% | 9% |
15 | ZHAO Sophie L. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% | |
16 | CAPELLUA Tommaso | 7% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 4% | ||
18 | CREEL Aidan H. | - | - | 3% | 23% | 43% | 27% | 5% |
19 | CHEN Andrew | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 23% |
20 | BOUIE Jacob | - | 2% | 20% | 42% | 30% | 6% | |
21 | LIM Samuel | - | 1% | 19% | 53% | 24% | 3% | |
22 | ZHAO Dylan L. | 2% | 14% | 38% | 35% | 10% | 1% | |
23 | CURTIS William K. | 2% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 11% | ||
24 | TEITENBERG John F. | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 6% | - |
25 | COVER Harrison | 10% | 35% | 39% | 15% | 1% | - | - |
26 | WALKER-JONES Ethan | 1% | 12% | 59% | 26% | 2% | - | |
27 | PANTIN Dominique L. | 6% | 31% | 41% | 19% | 3% | - | |
28 | JACOBSON Leah | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
29 | AMMON Blue | 34% | 47% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
30 | FRIEDENBERGER Jacob | 17% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
31 | FOYE Clay | 2% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 13% | 1% | - |
32 | TUGGY Sam | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - | |
33 | EDWARDS Darby | 3% | 15% | 30% | 30% | 16% | 4% | - |
34 | BAKER Julian L. | - | 2% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 11% | 1% |
35 | LIM Joshua | 20% | 44% | 30% | 6% | - | - | - |
36 | KNOPF Jenna G. | 21% | 44% | 29% | 6% | - | ||
37 | BURT Stephen | 43% | 50% | 7% | - | - | - | |
38 | HUANG Jonathan S. | 7% | 37% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
39 | SYKES Lauren | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
40 | COLLUM Thomas | 7% | 29% | 42% | 21% | 1% | - | |
41 | LIM Lance Jeremiah | 45% | 50% | 5% | - | - | - | |
42 | GRIMWOOD Donovan | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 5% | ||
43 | LE Tan | 11% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
44 | USELTON Kaden | 28% | 47% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - |
45 | SORRELLS Brea | 28% | 49% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.