La Jolla, CA - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | YEU Irene | - | - | 1% | 14% | 43% | 42% | |
2 | BEITTEL Chloe F. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 45% | 21% |
3 | SHAMSIAN Shaya | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
3 | BRILL Sophie | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 17% | 3% |
5 | LEANG Andrea K. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% | |
6 | KORNGUTH Lindsay | - | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 15% |
7 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 40% | 27% |
8 | BEIHOLD Emily M. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
9 | ZUHARS Renee A. | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% | |
10 | WANG Nora | 1% | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
11 | JIN Jasmine | - | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 39% | 24% |
12 | GAO Aretha R. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
13 | CHAN Cheri K. | - | - | 2% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% |
14 | SMIK Leonie A. | - | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
15 | BROOKS Tean R. | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 10% | |
16 | JIANG Claire | 21% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
17 | QURESHI Aafreen | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
18 | KIMURA Kimberley H. | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% | |
19 | GERARDIN Marie | 3% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
20 | YOUNG Ashley | - | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
21 | NGUYEN Kaylin A. | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% | |
22 | LEUNG Natalie | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
23 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 38% | 9% | |
24 | LAVERY Chloe K. | 4% | 30% | 43% | 20% | 3% | - | |
25 | ERTAS Eileen | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
26 | BEI Karen | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | |
27 | HARKNESS Anya C. | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | |
28 | DINGMAN Amanda | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - |
29 | DARANOUVONG Logan | 14% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | |
30 | STOJANOVIC Mina | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | |
31 | SOIN Anika A. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
32 | KIM Annabelle | 18% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
33 | LIEBER Josephine A. | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 3% | - |
34 | JIANG Corina | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
35 | LAU Brynn Mackenzie | 3% | 14% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 5% | - |
36 | WEBER Nora | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
37 | HOGE Natalie M. | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% | - |
38 | FREIBURGER Ilyssa M. | 1% | 12% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
39 | ZHOU Emily | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
40 | MARTUS Cosima O. | 2% | 21% | 42% | 29% | 6% | - | |
42 | ZHANG Ivyla | 20% | 42% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
43 | RODARTE Angelina | 31% | 41% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
44 | LI Kaitlyn K. | 65% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | |
46 | LI Charlotte | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.