La Jolla, CA - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YEU Irene | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 42% | |
| 2 | BEITTEL Chloe F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 21% |
| 3 | SHAMSIAN Shaya | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 3 | BRILL Sophie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 20% | 3% |
| 5 | LEANG Andrea K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 20% | |
| 6 | KORNGUTH Lindsay | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 15% |
| 7 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 27% |
| 8 | BEIHOLD Emily M. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 9 | ZUHARS Renee A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 73% | 31% | |
| 10 | WANG Nora | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 11 | JIN Jasmine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 24% |
| 12 | GAO Aretha R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% |
| 13 | CHAN Cheri K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 22% |
| 14 | SMIK Leonie A. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 5% | |
| 15 | BROOKS Tean R. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | |
| 16 | JIANG Claire | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 17 | QURESHI Aafreen | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 18 | KIMURA Kimberley H. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
| 19 | GERARDIN Marie | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 20 | YOUNG Ashley | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
| 21 | NGUYEN Kaylin A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% | |
| 22 | LEUNG Natalie | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 6% | |
| 23 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 46% | 9% | |
| 24 | LAVERY Chloe K. | 100% | 96% | 65% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 25 | ERTAS Eileen | 100% | 97% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 26 | BEI Karen | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 27 | HARKNESS Anya C. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | |
| 28 | DINGMAN Amanda | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 29 | DARANOUVONG Logan | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 30 | STOJANOVIC Mina | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 31 | SOIN Anika A. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 32 | KIM Annabelle | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | LIEBER Josephine A. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 34 | JIANG Corina | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 35 | LAU Brynn Mackenzie | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 36 | WEBER Nora | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 37 | HOGE Natalie M. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 38 | FREIBURGER Ilyssa M. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 39 | ZHOU Emily | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 40 | MARTUS Cosima O. | 100% | 98% | 77% | 35% | 6% | - | |
| 42 | ZHANG Ivyla | 100% | 80% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | RODARTE Angelina | 100% | 69% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | LI Kaitlyn K. | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 46 | LI Charlotte | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.