Chatsworth, CA - Chatsworth, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WU Amelia | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 39% | 52% |
2 | LAVERY Chloe K. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 47% | 16% |
3 | MYERS Helen Sophia A. | - | - | 4% | 36% | 46% | 14% | |
3 | WANG Nora | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% | |
5 | LEUNG Natalie | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 58% |
6 | PACHECO Naomi | 6% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
7 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | - | - | 1% | 13% | 44% | 43% | |
8 | ZHOU Emily | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 37% | 14% | 1% |
9 | DINGMAN Amanda | - | - | 4% | 35% | 46% | 15% | |
10 | PEHLIVANI Zara | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 40% | 9% |
11 | GAURIAT Jade S. | 1% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 17% | 2% | - |
12 | QURESHI Nisa | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
13 | SINHA Zara | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 4% | - |
14 | SOIN Anika A. | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 16% | 2% |
15 | MYERS Jeanelle Christina A. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% | |
16 | GNANASEKAT Arti | 15% | 47% | 34% | 4% | - | - | |
17 | MAHAL Anya | 39% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
18 | OPERARIO Abigail Z. | 1% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | |
19 | PACHECO Evangeline | 1% | 9% | 33% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - |
20 | BROWNE Zoe | 7% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
21 | MAHAL Riya | 14% | 45% | 37% | 4% | - | - | |
22 | FUNG Carina W. | 7% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
22 | LIN Ashley | 35% | 43% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
24 | HSU Adele Y. | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | |
25 | SHI Ava | 43% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
26 | MUNEYB Muntaha Sana | 21% | 44% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.