La Jolla, CA - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KONG Vera | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% | |
| 2 | LEE Alexandra B. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% |
| 3 | HILL Julia W. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 3 | CAO Stephanie X. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
| 5 | YAP Madeline | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 6 | SHIN Andrea Y. | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 7 | WANG Caroline Y. | - | 2% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
| 8 | CHIN Erika J. | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 9 | GUZMAN Mariana M. | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 10 | CODY Alexandra C. | 1% | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 11 | CHOU Dana C. | 1% | 6% | 24% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 12 | SONG Jenny | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% |
| 13 | YONG Erika E. | - | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 14 | HE Charlotte | 1% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% | |
| 15 | CHERNOMORSKY Maria | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 16 | GEYER Carolina M. | 2% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
| 17 | YONG Annika A. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 12% |
| 18 | CHAN Audrey | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 9% | |
| 19 | CHERNOMORSKY Alexandra E. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 20 | MARSEE Samantha | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | |
| 21 | BALMASEDA Sabrina F. | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 7% | |
| 22 | GARCIA GABRIELA | 9% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 23 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
| 24 | VESTEL Mira B. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 25 | LIMB Madeline I. | - | 3% | 15% | 30% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 26 | COIMBRA Miya Y. | 2% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
| 27 | KONG Isabel | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 32% | 11% | |
| 28 | LIM Isabel K. | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
| 29 | LEE Erin Y. | 7% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 30 | TANG Catherine H. | 8% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 31 | ZHANG Cecilia | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 32 | WANG Elsabella Y. | 3% | 20% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 33 | PATEL Riya | 25% | 40% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | MENDIOLA RITCHIE Ingrid | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 35 | TOM Kristen Noelle C. | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 36 | MACDONALD Kaylie S. | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 37 | PANIGRAHI Sophia | 36% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 38 | FU Linqian (Helen) | 46% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 39 | HUANG Tina | 61% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - | |
| 40 | ANDRES Katherine A. | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.