La Jolla, CA - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KONG Vera | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% | |
| 2 | LEE Alexandra B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% |
| 3 | HILL Julia W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 17% |
| 3 | CAO Stephanie X. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 56% | 18% |
| 5 | YAP Madeline | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 6 | SHIN Andrea Y. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 7 | WANG Caroline Y. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 67% | 33% | 7% |
| 8 | CHIN Erika J. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 9 | GUZMAN Mariana M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
| 10 | CODY Alexandra C. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 11 | CHOU Dana C. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 12 | SONG Jenny | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 10% |
| 13 | YONG Erika E. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 14 | HE Charlotte | 100% | 99% | 84% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
| 15 | CHERNOMORSKY Maria | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
| 16 | GEYER Carolina M. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 10% | 1% | |
| 17 | YONG Annika A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 12% |
| 18 | CHAN Audrey | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 39% | 9% | |
| 19 | CHERNOMORSKY Alexandra E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 55% | 17% |
| 20 | MARSEE Samantha | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | |
| 21 | BALMASEDA Sabrina F. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 7% | |
| 22 | GARCIA GABRIELA | 100% | 91% | 64% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 23 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% |
| 24 | VESTEL Mira B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 8% |
| 25 | LIMB Madeline I. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 3% |
| 26 | COIMBRA Miya Y. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 13% | 1% | |
| 27 | KONG Isabel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 11% | |
| 28 | LIM Isabel K. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | |
| 29 | LEE Erin Y. | 100% | 93% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 30 | TANG Catherine H. | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 31 | ZHANG Cecilia | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 32 | WANG Elsabella Y. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 33 | PATEL Riya | 100% | 75% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | MENDIOLA RITCHIE Ingrid | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 35 | TOM Kristen Noelle C. | 100% | 89% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 36 | MACDONALD Kaylie S. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 37 | PANIGRAHI Sophia | 100% | 64% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 38 | FU Linqian (Helen) | 100% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 39 | HUANG Tina | 100% | 39% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 40 | ANDRES Katherine A. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.