Manalapan, NJ - Manalapan, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | WANG Ellen | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 2 | SADAN Jordan E. | V V D V V | V V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 3 | DAVIA Daniella V. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 3 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 5 | HO Brianna W. | D V V V V V | V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 6 | JANG Kimberley | V V V D V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 7 | WU Renee | V V D V V | V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 8 | KIM Lauren Hyomin | D V V D V | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 9 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | V V V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
| 10 | CHEN Kelly | D V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 11 | ZHANG Alina C. | V V V V D | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 12 | HECKMANN Emma | V D V V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 13 | WONG Sophia M. | V V D V V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 14 | LI Meilin | V D D V V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 15 | XU Christine | V V D D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 16 | HUANG NATALIE | D V V D D D | V V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 17 | LI Rachel Y. | V V V V D V | D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 18 | DRANOVSKY Dasha | D V V V D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 19 | SCHATZ Kristina J. | D V V V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 20 | XUE Alanna | D D D V V V | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 21 | HEISER Anna M. | V V D D D V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 22 | SHAW Kayla M. | V V D D D | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 23 | YU Lauren C. | V D D V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 24 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | V D V D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 25 | SHANG Andrea | V D D D V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 26 | TURNER Stephanie E. | D D V V D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 27 | WU Julianna Y. | V D V D D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 28 | GU Emily | D D D D V | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 29 | HOLLE Aviella S. | D D V D D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 30 | RENTON Samantha | D D D V D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 31 | DU Hannah | D D V D D D | V D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 32 | BECCHINA Claire E. | D D D D D | V D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 33 | BHAN Zala | D D D D V | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 34 | LENZ Zoe N. | D D D D V D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 35 | PAVE Claire | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 36 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 37 | YANIV Liya | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 38 | BHOGAL Sukhneet | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.