Manalapan, NJ - Manalapan, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WANG Ellen | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% | |
| 2 | SADAN Jordan E. | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 43% | 21% | |
| 3 | DAVIA Daniella V. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 38% |
| 3 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% | |
| 5 | HO Brianna W. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
| 6 | JANG Kimberley | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 22% | |
| 7 | WU Renee | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
| 8 | KIM Lauren Hyomin | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% | |
| 9 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 34% | 9% |
| 10 | CHEN Kelly | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 27% | 8% | |
| 11 | ZHANG Alina C. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 9% | |
| 12 | HECKMANN Emma | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 7% | |
| 13 | WONG Sophia M. | - | 3% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 14 | LI Meilin | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
| 15 | XU Christine | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | |
| 16 | HUANG NATALIE | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 17 | LI Rachel Y. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 18 | DRANOVSKY Dasha | 2% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
| 19 | SCHATZ Kristina J. | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
| 20 | XUE Alanna | - | 3% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 21 | HEISER Anna M. | 3% | 33% | 41% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 22 | SHAW Kayla M. | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
| 23 | YU Lauren C. | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 24 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 25 | SHANG Andrea | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
| 26 | TURNER Stephanie E. | 14% | 39% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | WU Julianna Y. | - | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 28 | GU Emily | 13% | 40% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 29 | HOLLE Aviella S. | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 30 | RENTON Samantha | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% | |
| 31 | DU Hannah | - | 4% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 32 | BECCHINA Claire E. | 34% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 33 | BHAN Zala | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | LENZ Zoe N. | 4% | 35% | 39% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 35 | PAVE Claire | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 45% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
| 37 | YANIV Liya | 84% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 38 | BHOGAL Sukhneet | 80% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.