Arlington, TX - Arlington, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HURME Tommi K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% |
| 2 | JAYENDRA Chandrashekar | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 28% |
| 3 | WILEY Joseph (Scott) S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 3 | GYURE Brayden H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 39% | 8% |
| 5 | FRAY Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 40% | 9% |
| 6 | KEHOE James E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 37% | 7% |
| 7 | MUGA Boris | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 20% | 2% | |
| 8 | DAVIS Scott | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 9 | PLAISANCE Louis | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% |
| 10 | STONE Henry J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 23% | 4% |
| 11 | ORTEGA Josue I. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% | |
| 12 | GASPAROVICH IV George M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% | 7% | |
| 13 | ILIEV Velizar K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 51% | |
| 14 | THAYER Jake T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 43% | |
| 15 | SUVOROV Yuly | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 23% |
| 16 | JOHNSON Ben | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 17 | MUNLIN Donovan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 63% | 23% |
| 18 | VENKAT Rakesh | 100% | 97% | 78% | 36% | 7% | - | |
| 19 | LUEBBE Jost | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 8% |
| 20 | SAYLOR Harrison G. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 21 | GUIMIOT Henri | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 22 | MALIASSOV Nikita S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 16% | |
| 23 | KARAUSKY Joshua C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 21% |
| 24 | FRANZNICK Charles (Charlie) W. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 25 | BRUS Brian V. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 26 | HANKINS Trace | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 25% | 4% |
| 27 | ORTEGA Salvador | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
| 28 | MAHMOUD Hossam | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 29 | GODDARD Hal D. | 100% | 93% | 62% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 30 | FUCHS Marshall J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 19% | |
| 31 | PHILLIPS Wesley Y. | 100% | 92% | 55% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | WHITE Douglas (Doug) W. | 100% | 88% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | DECKARD Blake B. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 43% | 9% | |
| 34 | WELDON Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 33% | 6% | |
| 35 | CONVERSE Warren D. | 100% | 95% | 67% | 26% | 4% | - | |
| 36 | COMER Alexander J. | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 37 | PANAYOTOV Alexander | 100% | 98% | 79% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 38 | CASTLEMAN Levi | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 39 | JAHANGIRI William J. | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 40 | KARKI Salyan | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | WERCHAN Andrew R. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 42 | STARR Michael | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 43 | SMITH Dylan | 100% | 95% | 69% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 44 | PHILLIPS Jeffrey T. | 100% | 97% | 75% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
| 45 | BARGE Jackson | 100% | 79% | 32% | 6% | - | - | |
| 46 | RIBAUDO David J. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 47 | HESSE Frederick Q. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 48 | OLDHAM Zachary | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 49 | UNDERWOOD John D. | 100% | 83% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | DOUGLAS Benjamin | 100% | 63% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
| 51 | GRAY Connor W. | 100% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 52 | ERTEL Mark C. | 100% | 52% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 53 | SONG Branden | 100% | 51% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.