Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | GHOSH Tuhin | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
| 2 | QIU Le | D V V D V V | V V V V D | 5.4 | 4 | -1.4 |
| 3 | MOSZCZYNSKI Adam | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 3 | CHO Brandon | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 5 | LEVIN Mark A. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 6 | HONG Vincent Q. | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 7 | LAU Jeremy Y. | V V V D V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 8 | LEMPERT Levy A. | V V D V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 9 | STRONG Jr James S. | V V V V D V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 10 | HUANG Ethan F. | D V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 11 | LEE Jude H. | V V V V D | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 12 | WONG Ryan | D V D V V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 13 | WU Wilmund | V D V D D V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 14 | KREGER Evan | D V D D V V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 15 | DENG Andrew | D V V V D D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 16 | BERMAN Luca | D V D V V D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 17 | HO Kaden M. | V D V V D V | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 18 | SHTEYN Mark | V D V V D V | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 19 | BOURGHOL Matthew | V D D V V V | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 20 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | V D V V D V | D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 21 | FISK Ethan | D V V D V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 22 | NOBLE Colin | D D D V V V | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 23 | PIWOWAR Alex | V D V D V D | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 24 | BUCCINO George | V D V D D | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 25 | ZHENG Edward L. | V D V D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 26 | ZHUANG Rayken | D V D D V D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 27 | PANDEY Neil | D V D V D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 28 | NEVILLE James | D D V D D V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 29 | LO Alexander | D D D D V | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 30 | GEORGE Daniel | D D D V D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 31 | CHERNAEV Aleksandar | D V D D D D | V D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 32 | PENG Bryan | D D V D D D | V D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 33 | CHAN Alexander S. | D D D V D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 34 | ROSEN Ben | V D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 34 | ZHANG Yankun | D D D D V D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 36 | CHENG Kyle | V D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 37 | HONG Justin | D V D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 38 | ZELAYA Jayson | V D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 39 | CHAO Junzhi | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 40 | KING Connor | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.