Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | XU Andy P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 42% |
| 2 | MARX Jackson L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 73% |
| 3 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 21% | |
| 3 | GULCHIN Mark | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% | 8% |
| 5 | BOBROW Silas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 22% | |
| 6 | SHIM Peter S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 3% |
| 7 | MARTIN Darius | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% | |
| 8 | LEE Brendan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 32% | 6% |
| 9 | WONG Jacob W. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% | 8% | |
| 10 | CHEN Kyle P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% |
| 11 | LI Allen | 100% | 82% | 45% | 15% | 3% | < 1% | - |
| 12 | SIMONOV Timofey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 30% | |
| 13 | GHEDINI Luca | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 13% | 1% |
| 14 | MO Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 25% | |
| 15 | PARK Maxwell | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% | 20% | 3% | |
| 16 | KIAYIAS Aris | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 17% | 2% | |
| 17 | KOKES William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 21% | |
| 18 | ZENG Rick | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 19 | GEOGHEGAN Logan | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
| 20 | TANG Royce | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% | 10% | - |
| 21 | TOOMRE Luca | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
| 22 | TANG Terry | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 23 | CHA James | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 24 | SICAT Justin | 100% | 97% | 70% | 23% | 3% | - | - |
| 25 | TOOMRE Kai | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% | |
| 26 | MARTIRE Luca | 100% | 88% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | FOGELSON Hugh | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 28 | ONIK Ari N. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% | |
| 29 | POLEBOYINA Amrit | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 30 | CHO Xzander | 100% | 85% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 31 | ZHANG Lucas | 100% | 90% | 52% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | HONG Logan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
| 33 | NORMILE Nicholas | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 34 | DONG Joshua | 100% | 78% | 30% | 5% | - | - | |
| 35 | YAO Ethan | 100% | 86% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | SANDOW Sterling | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 37 | SHAW eric | 100% | 47% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 38 | XIA Philip | 100% | 55% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 39 | ZHAO Ryan | 100% | 71% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.