Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LI Meilin | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 2 | LEE Lavender | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
| 3 | WONG Sophia M. | V V D V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 3 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 5 | CHEN Allison V. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
| 6 | WU Irene M. | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 7 | CHEN Kelly | V D V V V V | V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 8 | CHO Rebecca H. | V D V V D V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 9 | EYER Hailey M. | V V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 10 | ZHANG Alina C. | V V V D V V | V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 11 | SARTORI Taylor M. | V V V D D V | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 12 | FELLUS Talia E. | D V D V V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 13 | HUANG NATALIE | V V D V D | V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
| 14 | CHARALEL Jessica | D D V V V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 15 | LIU Angel(Daying) | D V V V D D | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 16 | KOKES Gwendolen | V D D V V D | V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 17 | YU Lauren C. | V V V D V V | D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 18 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | D V V V D V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 19 | ORVANANOS Anice | V D V D V V | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 20 | TOBIN Brean | V D V V D V | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 21 | ROHRING Anna L. | D V V D V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 22 | ROY Layla | D D V V D V | D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
| 23 | SOLDATOVA Maria | V V D D D V | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 23 | XIANG Emma | D V V D V D | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 25 | HOU Wendong | D D V V D V | V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 26 | PAVE Claire | D D V D V D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 27 | CHEN Jasmine | D V D D D V | V D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 28 | HUNT Abigail S. | V V D D D D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 29 | SLASKI Caroline O. | V D D D D D | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 30 | SHA Yi Ling | D D D V D D | V D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 31 | PARK Caitlyn | D D D D V D | V D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 32 | LEE Kaitlyn | D D D D D D | V D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 33 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | D V D D V D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 34 | PARK Jacqueline | V D D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 35 | LIU Sophia | V D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 36 | OETZEL Taylor | D D D D V D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 37 | SCARLETT Skye | D D D V D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 38 | PAN Anna | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 39 | WANG Ashley | D D D D D D | D | 2.9 | 0 | -2.9 |
| 40 | JIN Wendy | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 41 | SHTROM Uma A. | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.