Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LI Meilin | - | - | 2% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% |
2 | LEE Lavender | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 35% | 10% |
3 | WONG Sophia M. | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
3 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
5 | CHEN Allison V. | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
6 | WU Irene M. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
7 | CHEN Kelly | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% |
8 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
9 | EYER Hailey M. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 48% | 42% | |
10 | ZHANG Alina C. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% |
11 | SARTORI Taylor M. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% |
12 | FELLUS Talia E. | - | 6% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - |
13 | HUANG NATALIE | - | - | 1% | 10% | 51% | 39% | |
14 | CHARALEL Jessica | - | 8% | 34% | 46% | 11% | 1% | |
15 | LIU Angel(Daying) | - | - | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 4% |
16 | KOKES Gwendolen | 1% | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
17 | YU Lauren C. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% |
18 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | - | 6% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
19 | ORVANANOS Anice | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 4% |
20 | TOBIN Brean | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
21 | ROHRING Anna L. | 4% | 27% | 47% | 21% | 2% | - | |
22 | ROY Layla | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% |
23 | SOLDATOVA Maria | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
23 | XIANG Emma | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 4% |
25 | HOU Wendong | 13% | 41% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
26 | PAVE Claire | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
27 | CHEN Jasmine | 32% | 41% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
28 | HUNT Abigail S. | 1% | 10% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
29 | SLASKI Caroline O. | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
30 | SHA Yi Ling | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
31 | PARK Caitlyn | 48% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
32 | LEE Kaitlyn | 23% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
33 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
34 | PARK Jacqueline | 16% | 47% | 31% | 6% | - | - | |
35 | LIU Sophia | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
36 | OETZEL Taylor | 30% | 47% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
37 | SCARLETT Skye | 50% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
38 | PAN Anna | 25% | 54% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
39 | WANG Ashley | 1% | 7% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
40 | JIN Wendy | 50% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
41 | SHTROM Uma A. | 31% | 47% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.