Edison, NJ - Edison, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KHROL Jaclyn | - | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 78% |
2 | KUZNETSOV Victoria | - | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 4% |
3 | LIN Jessica Y. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% |
3 | KIM Diane E. | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 13% | |
5 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% | |
6 | KOWALSKY Rachel A. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% | |
7 | GU Sarah | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 28% | |
8 | LIN Elaine | 6% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
9 | FALLON Kyle R. | - | - | 3% | 22% | 47% | 28% | |
10 | ALVIDREZ Francesca A. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% | |
11 | NI Emma | - | - | 3% | 22% | 47% | 28% | |
12 | LEE Olive | - | - | 4% | 18% | 40% | 35% | 4% |
13 | GABERKORN Nadia | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% | |
14 | MAO Amy | - | 2% | 15% | 44% | 32% | 7% | |
15 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% | |
16 | KOKES Ava | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
17 | LU Junyao | - | 1% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 13% | |
18 | WITTE Vera | 2% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
19 | GAO Judy | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% | - |
20 | LONG Cindy | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 1% |
21 | BLAKE Caira | - | 8% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 4% | |
22 | TOMASELLO Olivia E. | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
23 | WONG Alexandra R. | 19% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
24 | ZIGALO Elizabeth | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
25 | FURMAN Maria | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
26 | EBRAHIM Ameera H. | 1% | 19% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
27 | HOSANAGAR Inchara | 4% | 36% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | |
28 | VINE Melissa | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
29 | DE JAGER Celine | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% | |
30 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | 2% | 33% | 43% | 19% | 3% | - | |
31 | LI Alisha | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
32 | MING Cynthia | < 1% | 8% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% | |
33 | ZAKHAROV Anne (Anya) E. | 5% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
34 | HICKS Grace | 5% | 37% | 44% | 13% | 1% | - | |
35 | WELLS Emily | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | |
36 | REID Anousheh | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
37 | CHANG Ella | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
38 | KIM Lynne | 76% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | |
39 | GUJJA Misha | 13% | 39% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
40 | ZENG Katrina | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | |
41 | RHODY Evalyn | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | |
42 | GUZZI Jordan | 35% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
43 | LIU Alice | 33% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
44 | SHUKLA Tanya | 86% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.