Edison, NJ - Edison, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KHROL Jaclyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% |
2 | KUZNETSOV Victoria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 32% | 4% |
3 | LIN Jessica Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% |
3 | KIM Diane E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 50% | 13% | |
5 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% | |
6 | KOWALSKY Rachel A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 27% | |
7 | GU Sarah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 28% | |
8 | LIN Elaine | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
9 | FALLON Kyle R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 28% | |
10 | ALVIDREZ Francesca A. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 5% | |
11 | NI Emma | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 28% | |
12 | LEE Olive | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 39% | 4% |
13 | GABERKORN Nadia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% | |
14 | MAO Amy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 39% | 7% | |
15 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% | |
16 | KOKES Ava | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
17 | LU Junyao | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 13% | |
18 | WITTE Vera | 100% | 98% | 75% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
19 | GAO Judy | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | - |
20 | LONG Cindy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 18% | 1% |
21 | BLAKE Caira | 100% | 100% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 4% | |
22 | TOMASELLO Olivia E. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% | |
23 | WONG Alexandra R. | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | |
24 | ZIGALO Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 11% | 1% |
25 | FURMAN Maria | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - |
26 | EBRAHIM Ameera H. | 100% | 99% | 80% | 38% | 9% | 1% | |
27 | HOSANAGAR Inchara | 100% | 96% | 60% | 16% | 2% | - | |
28 | VINE Melissa | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 3% | |
29 | DE JAGER Celine | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% | |
30 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | 100% | 98% | 65% | 22% | 4% | - | |
31 | LI Alisha | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
32 | MING Cynthia | 100% | 100% | 91% | 62% | 24% | 4% | |
33 | ZAKHAROV Anne (Anya) E. | 100% | 95% | 69% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
34 | HICKS Grace | 100% | 95% | 58% | 14% | 1% | - | |
35 | WELLS Emily | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | |
36 | REID Anousheh | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 6% | |
37 | CHANG Ella | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | |
38 | KIM Lynne | 100% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | |
39 | GUJJA Misha | 100% | 87% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
40 | ZENG Katrina | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | |
41 | RHODY Evalyn | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | |
42 | GUZZI Jordan | 100% | 65% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
43 | LIU Alice | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
44 | SHUKLA Tanya | 100% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.