Edison, NJ - Edison, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | RHODES Zander | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 31% | 63% |
| 2 | CHUSID Renata M. | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 46% | 27% |
| 3 | FLANAGAN Catherine H. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
| 3 | KOKES Gabrielle | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 13% |
| 5 | HO Brianna W. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
| 6 | KIM Rachael | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
| 7 | CHUSID Mikayla | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 1% | |
| 8 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% | |
| 9 | LEE Allison (Allie) | - | - | - | 5% | 28% | 45% | 22% |
| 10 | KOO Rachel A. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% |
| 11 | GAYDOS Sofia C. | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% | |
| 12 | ZHANG Alina C. | 6% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
| 13 | JANG Kimberley | - | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 14 | MCGILLION-MOORE Katie | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 15 | SERBAN Samantha M. | - | 1% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 2% |
| 16 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 17 | SHAW Kayla M. | - | 1% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 18 | LI Meilin | - | 2% | 15% | 45% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 19 | PEVZNER Victoria | - | - | 1% | 14% | 41% | 35% | 9% |
| 20 | WONG Sophia M. | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 21 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | 7% | 37% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 22 | SARTORI Taylor M. | - | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 2% |
| 23 | BOODELL Ella | 1% | 28% | 41% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 24 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 25 | CHEN Jia P. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% | |
| 26 | PERLMAN Talia | - | 3% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 27 | HUANG NATALIE | 3% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 28 | LENZ Zoe N. | 12% | 46% | 36% | 7% | - | - | - |
| 29 | MEYER Claudia | 53% | 38% | 8% | - | - | - | - |
| 30 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 66% | 30% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 31 | EYER Hailey M. | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | 16% | 55% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 33 | SHTROM Uma A. | 98% | 2% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 34 | HALM Alexandra F. | 36% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.