Edison, NJ - Edison, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | RHODES Zander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 63% |
| 2 | CHUSID Renata M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 27% |
| 3 | FLANAGAN Catherine H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 25% |
| 3 | KOKES Gabrielle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 13% |
| 5 | HO Brianna W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
| 6 | KIM Rachael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
| 7 | CHUSID Mikayla | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 1% | |
| 8 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 16% | |
| 9 | LEE Allison (Allie) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% | 22% |
| 10 | KOO Rachel A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 22% |
| 11 | GAYDOS Sofia C. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 8% | |
| 12 | ZHANG Alina C. | 100% | 94% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 13 | JANG Kimberley | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
| 14 | MCGILLION-MOORE Katie | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 8% | 1% |
| 15 | SERBAN Samantha M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 21% | 2% |
| 16 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 17 | SHAW Kayla M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 18 | LI Meilin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 38% | 8% | 1% |
| 19 | PEVZNER Victoria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 44% | 9% |
| 20 | WONG Sophia M. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 21 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | 100% | 93% | 56% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 22 | SARTORI Taylor M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 2% |
| 23 | BOODELL Ella | 100% | 99% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 24 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 25 | CHEN Jia P. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% | |
| 26 | PERLMAN Talia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 27 | HUANG NATALIE | 100% | 97% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 28 | LENZ Zoe N. | 100% | 88% | 43% | 7% | - | - | - |
| 29 | MEYER Claudia | 100% | 47% | 9% | - | - | - | - |
| 30 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 100% | 34% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 31 | EYER Hailey M. | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | 100% | 84% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 33 | SHTROM Uma A. | 100% | 2% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 34 | HALM Alexandra F. | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.