Edison, NJ - Edison, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | PEVZNER Victoria | V V V V D | V V V V V | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 2 | FANG Sabrina | V V V V V D | V V V V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
| 3 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 3 | LI Meilin | V V D V V | V V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 5 | HO Brianna W. | V D V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 6 | JANG Kimberley | V D V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 7 | CHUSID Mikayla | V D D V V | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 8 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | V V D V D | V V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 9 | MCGILLION-MOORE Katie | V V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 10 | SARTORI Taylor M. | V V D V V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 11 | EYER Hailey M. | V D V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 12 | WONG Sophia M. | V V V V D | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 13 | CHEN Jia P. | V V V V D | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 14 | GAYDOS Sofia C. | V D V V V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 15 | PERLMAN Talia | D V V V D V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 16 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | D V V D V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 17 | CHO Rebecca H. | D D V V V V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 18 | HUANG NATALIE | D V V D V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 19 | ZHANG Alina C. | D V D V V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 20 | ROY Layla | D V V D V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 21 | LEE Lavender | D V D V D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 22 | LEE Bethany W. | D V D D V V | D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 23 | SIMONOV Dasha | V V V D D D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 24 | YU Lauren C. | D D V V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 25 | SHAW Kayla M. | V V D D D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 26 | XU Madison | V D D D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 27 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | V D D D D V | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 28 | SEO IRENE Y. | D D V D D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 29 | SLASKI Caroline O. | D V D D D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 30 | LENZ Zoe N. | D D D V D D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 31 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | D D D D D | V D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 32 | ZHOU Catherine | D D D D D | V D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 33 | PAULUS Isabella | D D D D V | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 34 | MARKOVSKY Nina | V D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 35 | LEE DAYOUNG | D D D D D | D | 0.0 | 0 | - |
| 36 | GOLBIN Ariella J. | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 37 | SHTROM Uma A. | D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 38 | CHAGARES Isabella | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.