Edison, NJ - Edison, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | PEVZNER Victoria | - | - | 6% | 27% | 43% | 23% | |
2 | FANG Sabrina | - | - | - | - | 6% | 32% | 62% |
3 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 50% |
3 | LI Meilin | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 35% | 10% | |
5 | HO Brianna W. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 41% | |
6 | JANG Kimberley | - | 1% | 17% | 40% | 33% | 9% | |
7 | CHUSID Mikayla | - | 1% | 21% | 42% | 29% | 7% | |
8 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | - | - | 7% | 31% | 44% | 16% | |
9 | MCGILLION-MOORE Katie | - | 2% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
10 | SARTORI Taylor M. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 42% | 32% | 5% |
11 | EYER Hailey M. | - | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
12 | WONG Sophia M. | - | 3% | 26% | 44% | 22% | 3% | |
13 | CHEN Jia P. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% | |
14 | GAYDOS Sofia C. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% | |
15 | PERLMAN Talia | - | - | 6% | 28% | 42% | 22% | 2% |
16 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | - | - | 13% | 38% | 37% | 12% | |
17 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 39% | 15% | 1% |
18 | HUANG NATALIE | - | 7% | 36% | 40% | 15% | 2% | |
19 | ZHANG Alina C. | - | 6% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% | |
20 | ROY Layla | 4% | 30% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - | |
21 | LEE Lavender | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
22 | LEE Bethany W. | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 6% |
23 | SIMONOV Dasha | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
24 | YU Lauren C. | 3% | 25% | 42% | 24% | 5% | - | |
25 | SHAW Kayla M. | - | 3% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 8% | |
26 | XU Madison | - | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | |
27 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | 3% | 28% | 46% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
28 | SEO IRENE Y. | - | 18% | 39% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
29 | SLASKI Caroline O. | 3% | 80% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
30 | LENZ Zoe N. | 10% | 36% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
31 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 50% | 43% | 7% | - | - | - | |
32 | ZHOU Catherine | 65% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | |
33 | PAULUS Isabella | 31% | 54% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
34 | MARKOVSKY Nina | 9% | 45% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
35 | LEE DAYOUNG | 96% | 4% | - | - | - | - | |
36 | GOLBIN Ariella J. | 48% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
37 | SHTROM Uma A. | 95% | 5% | - | - | - | - | |
38 | CHAGARES Isabella | 65% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.