Edison, NJ - Edison, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | POSSICK Lola P. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% |
| 2 | ENGELMAN Madeline A. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 48% | 19% |
| 3 | ALCEBAR Kayla | - | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% | |
| 3 | SHOMAN Jenna | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 41% | |
| 5 | CHANG Josephine S. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
| 6 | SHOMAN Miriam | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 7 | NEIBART Fiona | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 8 | FOUR-GARCIA Madison | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 41% | 49% |
| 9 | CARVALHO Isabela A. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 41% | 15% |
| 10 | PAK Kaitlyn | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 34% |
| 11 | BOIS Adele | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 29% |
| 12 | PRIEUR Lauren | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 13 | CHIOLDI Mina | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% | |
| 14 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 14% |
| 15 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | 1% | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 16 | BAKER Audrey C. | - | 5% | 23% | 41% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 17 | NEWELL Alexia C. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 9% |
| 18 | KIM Marley I. | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 19 | TAO Hannah J. | - | - | 5% | 26% | 47% | 20% | |
| 20 | LI Amanda C. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 41% | 29% | 6% |
| 21 | ATLURI Sara V. | - | 1% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 3% |
| 22 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | - | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 6% |
| 23 | SINHA Anika | 1% | 5% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 24 | MIKA Veronica | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
| 25 | LIGH Erenei J. | 9% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 26 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | - | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 27 | JIN Olivia P. | 4% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 28 | OBRADOVIC Ana | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 29 | NATH Trisha | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 30 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 1% | 8% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 31 | VADASZ Ibla P. | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 32 | GOMERMAN Sophia | 21% | 43% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | FEIG Sela | 10% | 38% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 34 | KRYLOVA Valery | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 35 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 36 | LEVITIS Danielle | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 37 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | 1% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 14% | 2% | |
| 38 | SULLIVAN Kate | 31% | 45% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 39 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 40 | XIKES Katherine E. | 3% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 41 | SHIH Christina | 5% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 42 | SOURIMTO Valeria | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 42 | NGUYEN Ella | 14% | 37% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 44 | DUCKETT Madison | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | |
| 45 | MARYASH Samantha | 28% | 41% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | ALTIRS Kate | 10% | 41% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | NAYAK Esha | 57% | 36% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 48 | DANK Dina | 3% | 22% | 42% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 49 | FESTA Carina | 37% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 50 | DAI Olivia | 27% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | JAVERI Amaya | 45% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 52 | NAYAK Anika | 28% | 41% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | ALANGAD Rhea | 23% | 45% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 54 | LEUNG Ashlyn K. | 25% | 46% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.