Edison, NJ - Edison, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | POSSICK Lola P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% |
| 2 | ENGELMAN Madeline A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 19% |
| 3 | ALCEBAR Kayla | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% | |
| 3 | SHOMAN Jenna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 41% | |
| 5 | CHANG Josephine S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 30% |
| 6 | SHOMAN Miriam | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 7 | NEIBART Fiona | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 30% | 5% | - |
| 8 | FOUR-GARCIA Madison | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 49% |
| 9 | CARVALHO Isabela A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 15% |
| 10 | PAK Kaitlyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 34% |
| 11 | BOIS Adele | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 29% |
| 12 | PRIEUR Lauren | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 8% |
| 13 | CHIOLDI Mina | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% | |
| 14 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 80% | 47% | 14% |
| 15 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 16 | BAKER Audrey C. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 17 | NEWELL Alexia C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 9% |
| 18 | KIM Marley I. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 19 | TAO Hannah J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 20% | |
| 20 | LI Amanda C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 35% | 6% |
| 21 | ATLURI Sara V. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 21% | 3% |
| 22 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 36% | 6% |
| 23 | SINHA Anika | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 24 | MIKA Veronica | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 9% | |
| 25 | LIGH Erenei J. | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 26 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 27 | JIN Olivia P. | 100% | 96% | 72% | 30% | 5% | - | |
| 28 | OBRADOVIC Ana | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 29 | NATH Trisha | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 30 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 31 | VADASZ Ibla P. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 32 | GOMERMAN Sophia | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | FEIG Sela | 100% | 90% | 52% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 34 | KRYLOVA Valery | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 35 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 36 | LEVITIS Danielle | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 37 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 16% | 2% | |
| 38 | SULLIVAN Kate | 100% | 69% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 39 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 40 | XIKES Katherine E. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 41 | SHIH Christina | 100% | 95% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 42 | SOURIMTO Valeria | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 42 | NGUYEN Ella | 100% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 44 | DUCKETT Madison | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 3% | |
| 45 | MARYASH Samantha | 100% | 72% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | ALTIRS Kate | 100% | 90% | 49% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | NAYAK Esha | 100% | 43% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 48 | DANK Dina | 100% | 97% | 75% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 49 | FESTA Carina | 100% | 63% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 50 | DAI Olivia | 100% | 73% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | JAVERI Amaya | 100% | 55% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 52 | NAYAK Anika | 100% | 72% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | ALANGAD Rhea | 100% | 77% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 54 | LEUNG Ashlyn K. | 100% | 75% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.