Tiger Open 2020

Div III Mixed Foil

Saturday, February 29, 2020 at 2:00 PM

Fike Recreation Center - Clemson, SC, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5
1 VIVEROS Evan - 3% 17% 37% 33% 9%
2 HUSSAIN Mustafa - 3% 20% 40% 30% 7%
3 HERNANDEZ Veronica L. 4% 26% 44% 24% 2%
3 PARK Jong-Eun 2% 17% 39% 33% 9%
5 RUDOLPH Max B. - - 2% 13% 40% 44%
6 ROBBINS James - 6% 28% 41% 22% 3%
7 VIVEROS Oscar A. - 4% 21% 44% 31%
8 DE COQUET Maximilian 7% 26% 35% 23% 7% 1%
9 MALLOY Patrick G. - - 1% 7% 35% 57%
10 NOVIKOV Sienna 11% 34% 37% 16% 2%
10 BRUCE Roman - - 6% 35% 59%
12 AYERS Joshua - 3% 15% 33% 35% 14%
13 ANDERSON Sidney E. 1% 11% 33% 37% 16% 2%
14 THOMAS Richard E. 2% 15% 33% 32% 14% 2%
15 KUHNS James 1% 14% 45% 34% 7% -
16 THORNTON Zachary 2% 15% 39% 35% 10%
17 CAMPBELL Justin 13% 37% 36% 13% 1%
18 WILLIAMS-HOWE Sydney 9% 39% 37% 13% 2% -
19 HEMENG Oppong M. 1% 8% 27% 38% 22% 4%
20 VIVEROS Antonio 2% 15% 34% 34% 14% 2%
21 BUTFILOSKI Cooper B. 2% 28% 44% 22% 3%
22 SORRELLS Brea 59% 34% 6% - -
23 OTERO Dante 2% 14% 36% 36% 13%
24 EDWARDS Cody 1% 11% 41% 39% 8%
25 WATKINS Christopher M. - 5% 29% 44% 20% 1%
26 PAVLINEC John (Jack) C. 11% 31% 35% 19% 5% -
27 MURRAY Phelan 4% 18% 34% 30% 13% 2%
28 HUYNH Jennifer 2% 16% 39% 33% 10% 1%
29 DUCK Parker 2% 14% 35% 35% 13% 1%
30 SALKIND Edward M. 2% 14% 33% 35% 15% 1%
32 HAWTHORNE Lauren 11% 37% 38% 13% 1% -
33 DAILEY John 1% 10% 34% 42% 13%
34 HARTMANS Jae 19% 42% 30% 9% 1% -
35 RALSTON Isabel 32% 44% 20% 4% - -
36 OLIVER Rachel 36% 46% 16% 2% -
37 GRANKE Clarissa 16% 40% 33% 10% 1%
38 GAZDECKI Adam 2% 15% 34% 34% 13% 1%
39 MITCHELL Linsay 12% 36% 37% 13% 2% -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.