Fike Recreation Center - Clemson, SC, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | VIVEROS Evan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 9% |
| 2 | HUSSAIN Mustafa | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 37% | 7% |
| 3 | HERNANDEZ Veronica L. | 100% | 96% | 70% | 25% | 2% | |
| 3 | PARK Jong-Eun | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 9% | |
| 5 | RUDOLPH Max B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% |
| 6 | ROBBINS James | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 25% | 3% |
| 7 | VIVEROS Oscar A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% | |
| 8 | DE COQUET Maximilian | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 9 | MALLOY Patrick G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% |
| 10 | NOVIKOV Sienna | 100% | 89% | 55% | 18% | 2% | |
| 10 | BRUCE Roman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 59% | |
| 12 | AYERS Joshua | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
| 13 | ANDERSON Sidney E. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 18% | 2% |
| 14 | THOMAS Richard E. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 15 | KUHNS James | 100% | 99% | 85% | 41% | 7% | - |
| 16 | THORNTON Zachary | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 10% | |
| 17 | CAMPBELL Justin | 100% | 87% | 50% | 14% | 1% | |
| 18 | WILLIAMS-HOWE Sydney | 100% | 91% | 52% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 19 | HEMENG Oppong M. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 4% |
| 20 | VIVEROS Antonio | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
| 21 | BUTFILOSKI Cooper B. | 100% | 98% | 69% | 25% | 3% | |
| 22 | SORRELLS Brea | 100% | 41% | 7% | - | - | |
| 23 | OTERO Dante | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 13% | |
| 24 | EDWARDS Cody | 100% | 99% | 88% | 47% | 8% | |
| 25 | WATKINS Christopher M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% | 21% | 1% |
| 26 | PAVLINEC John (Jack) C. | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 27 | MURRAY Phelan | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 28 | HUYNH Jennifer | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 11% | 1% |
| 29 | DUCK Parker | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 14% | 1% |
| 30 | SALKIND Edward M. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 16% | 1% |
| 32 | HAWTHORNE Lauren | 100% | 89% | 52% | 15% | 1% | - |
| 33 | DAILEY John | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 13% | |
| 34 | HARTMANS Jae | 100% | 81% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 35 | RALSTON Isabel | 100% | 68% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 36 | OLIVER Rachel | 100% | 64% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 37 | GRANKE Clarissa | 100% | 84% | 44% | 10% | 1% | |
| 38 | GAZDECKI Adam | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 1% |
| 39 | MITCHELL Linsay | 100% | 88% | 52% | 15% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.