Fike Recreation Center - Clemson, SC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MELLONE Carl (Carlo) J. | - | - | - | - | 7% | 46% | 47% |
| 2 | DOARES Andrew | - | - | 5% | 28% | 44% | 23% | |
| 3 | FONZO Ian | - | - | 3% | 23% | 47% | 27% | |
| 3 | JACOB Bret | - | 3% | 40% | 41% | 14% | 2% | |
| 5 | MORRISROE Hunter | - | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 15% |
| 6 | SILVA Daniel | - | - | 2% | 16% | 41% | 36% | 5% |
| 7 | FERNANDEZ Rodrigo | - | - | 9% | 33% | 42% | 17% | |
| 8 | BLAKEBOROUGH Alan D. | - | 4% | 15% | 29% | 31% | 17% | 3% |
| 9 | RAULS Jackson V. | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 31% | 13% |
| 10 | YUAN Langjie R. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 50% | 13% |
| 11 | WALLACE Cade | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 12 | LOGGINS Austin J. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 39% | 36% | 4% |
| 13 | HOOKASSIAN Austin N. | - | - | - | - | 10% | 51% | 38% |
| 14 | RICH Jack | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 40% | 13% | |
| 15 | COLLINS Andrew M. | - | 3% | 19% | 51% | 24% | 3% | - |
| 16 | LISSO Ria A. | - | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 17 | RICHERSON James | 1% | 10% | 25% | 32% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 18 | DILLE Carolina G. | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 19 | KELLNER Taylor T. | - | - | 7% | 30% | 43% | 19% | |
| 20 | GRAHAM Ian | 3% | 15% | 31% | 30% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 21 | JARDIM Kyle A. | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
| 22 | DILLE Jackson K. | 2% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 23 | WARD Nicholas | 2% | 14% | 31% | 31% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 24 | CONREY Chris | 24% | 44% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 25 | WISEMAN Derrick T. | - | - | 8% | 36% | 41% | 14% | |
| 26 | JAYASANKAR Hari | 2% | 29% | 52% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | CHEN Andrew | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 28 | CHEN Ethan | 8% | 36% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 29 | NI Yan-Jing | 17% | 41% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | PATTERSON Michael | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 31 | BOWE Trey | 18% | 49% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 32 | COLLIER Nathanael L. | 9% | 81% | 10% | - | - | - | |
| 33 | PRICE Walter | 85% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 34 | LE Brandon | 2% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 35 | CLARK VERGARA Douglas Jordan | 13% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 36 | CREVELING Kathryn | 53% | 43% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 37 | WEST Matthew S. | 34% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 38 | LIOTTA Madison | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | MANN Michael | 6% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 40 | DAWSON Todd | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.