Fike Recreation Center - Clemson, SC, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MELLONE Carl (Carlo) J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 47% |
| 2 | DOARES Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% | 23% | |
| 3 | FONZO Ian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 27% | |
| 3 | JACOB Bret | 100% | 100% | 96% | 57% | 16% | 2% | |
| 5 | MORRISROE Hunter | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 15% |
| 6 | SILVA Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 41% | 5% |
| 7 | FERNANDEZ Rodrigo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% | 58% | 17% | |
| 8 | BLAKEBOROUGH Alan D. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 51% | 20% | 3% |
| 9 | RAULS Jackson V. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 44% | 13% |
| 10 | YUAN Langjie R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 63% | 13% |
| 11 | WALLACE Cade | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 12 | LOGGINS Austin J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 40% | 4% |
| 13 | HOOKASSIAN Austin N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 89% | 38% |
| 14 | RICH Jack | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% | 13% | |
| 15 | COLLINS Andrew M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 27% | 4% | - |
| 16 | LISSO Ria A. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 17 | RICHERSON James | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 18 | DILLE Carolina G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 5% |
| 19 | KELLNER Taylor T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 62% | 19% | |
| 20 | GRAHAM Ian | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 21 | JARDIM Kyle A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 22% | 3% |
| 22 | DILLE Jackson K. | 100% | 98% | 77% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 23 | WARD Nicholas | 100% | 98% | 83% | 53% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 24 | CONREY Chris | 100% | 76% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 25 | WISEMAN Derrick T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% | 56% | 14% | |
| 26 | JAYASANKAR Hari | 100% | 98% | 69% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | CHEN Andrew | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 28 | CHEN Ethan | 100% | 92% | 56% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 29 | NI Yan-Jing | 100% | 83% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | PATTERSON Michael | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 31 | BOWE Trey | 100% | 82% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 32 | COLLIER Nathanael L. | 100% | 91% | 10% | - | - | - | |
| 33 | PRICE Walter | 100% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 34 | LE Brandon | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 35 | CLARK VERGARA Douglas Jordan | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 36 | CREVELING Kathryn | 100% | 47% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 37 | WEST Matthew S. | 100% | 66% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 38 | LIOTTA Madison | 100% | 71% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | MANN Michael | 100% | 94% | 67% | 28% | 6% | - | - |
| 40 | DAWSON Todd | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.