Fike Recreation Center - Clemson, SC, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | COLLINS Andrew M. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 2 | LISSO Ria A. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 3 | WISEMAN Derrick T. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 3 | KELLNER Taylor T. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 5 | JACOB Bret | V V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 5 | MORRISROE Hunter | V V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 7 | LOGGINS Austin J. | V V D V V V | V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
| 8 | KRENZIN Elijah | V V V V D | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 9 | DELPH Spencer | V V V D V V | V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 10 | SILVA Daniel | V D V V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 11 | CHEN Ethan | D V V V V D | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 12 | CHEN Andrew | V V D D V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 13 | DILLE Carolina G. | D D V V V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 14 | GRAHAM Ian | D D V V V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 15 | JARDIM Kyle A. | V D V D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 16 | DILLE Jackson K. | V V D D D | V V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 17 | POTVIN Nathan | V V V V | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 18 | DAWSON Todd | V V D V D V | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 19 | BAYNE Nicholas | V D V D V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 20 | JAYASANKAR Hari | V V V D D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 21 | HSU Tammy | V V D D V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 22 | PAL Anjali G. | D D V V V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 23 | GORMAN Caroline | D D D V V V | V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 24 | AIKEN Charles | D D V V D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 25 | CONREY Chris | D V D V D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 26 | WARD Nicholas | D V V D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 27 | RICHERSON James | V D D V D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 28 | RENGER Felipe | V D D D D V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 29 | CLARK VERGARA Douglas Jordan | V D V D D D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 30 | COLLIER Nathanael L. | D V D D D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 31 | WEST Matthew S. | D D V D D | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 32 | WANG Andy | V D D D D D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 33 | PRICE Walter | D D D V V | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 34 | PATTERSON Michael | D V D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 35 | ROACH Hal | D D D V D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 36 | HARRIS Patrick | D D D D V | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 37 | LE Brandon | V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 38 | CREVELING Kathryn | D D V D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 39 | BOWE Trey | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 40 | MANN Michael | D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 41 | MCCLURE Morgan | D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
| 42 | LIOTTA Madison | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 43 | NI Yan-Jing | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.