Fike Recreation Center - Clemson, SC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | COLLINS Andrew M. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 49% | 19% |
| 2 | LISSO Ria A. | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% | |
| 3 | WISEMAN Derrick T. | - | - | - | 6% | 39% | 55% | |
| 3 | KELLNER Taylor T. | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 58% | 25% |
| 5 | JACOB Bret | - | - | 5% | 25% | 44% | 26% | |
| 5 | MORRISROE Hunter | - | - | 4% | 25% | 50% | 21% | |
| 7 | LOGGINS Austin J. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 40% | 50% |
| 8 | KRENZIN Elijah | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 45% | 12% | |
| 9 | DELPH Spencer | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 10 | SILVA Daniel | - | 1% | 14% | 51% | 34% | ||
| 11 | CHEN Ethan | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 12 | CHEN Andrew | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | |
| 13 | DILLE Carolina G. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
| 14 | GRAHAM Ian | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | |
| 15 | JARDIM Kyle A. | - | 1% | 17% | 47% | 34% | ||
| 16 | DILLE Jackson K. | 2% | 19% | 41% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
| 17 | POTVIN Nathan | 1% | 15% | 52% | 28% | 4% | ||
| 18 | DAWSON Todd | - | - | 3% | 34% | 47% | 15% | 1% |
| 19 | BAYNE Nicholas | 3% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 7% | - | |
| 20 | JAYASANKAR Hari | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
| 21 | HSU Tammy | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 3% | |
| 22 | PAL Anjali G. | 9% | 28% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 23 | GORMAN Caroline | 14% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 24 | AIKEN Charles | - | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 25 | CONREY Chris | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% | - | |
| 26 | WARD Nicholas | - | 7% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 3% | |
| 27 | RICHERSON James | - | 4% | 23% | 42% | 27% | 3% | |
| 28 | RENGER Felipe | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 29 | CLARK VERGARA Douglas Jordan | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 35% | 12% | 1% |
| 30 | COLLIER Nathanael L. | 26% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | WEST Matthew S. | 14% | 49% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | WANG Andy | 11% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | PRICE Walter | 18% | 42% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | PATTERSON Michael | 12% | 63% | 22% | 3% | - | ||
| 35 | ROACH Hal | 33% | 50% | 16% | 1% | - | - | |
| 36 | HARRIS Patrick | 5% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 37 | LE Brandon | 4% | 24% | 45% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 38 | CREVELING Kathryn | 20% | 47% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 39 | BOWE Trey | 46% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 40 | MANN Michael | 71% | 27% | 3% | - | - | ||
| 41 | MCCLURE Morgan | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
| 42 | LIOTTA Madison | 18% | 46% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 43 | NI Yan-Jing | 25% | 45% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.