400 N High Street, OH - 400 N High Street, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | JOVANOVIC Jovan | - | 1% | 10% | 43% | 46% | |
| 2 | ANDROSYUK Alexander | - | 3% | 23% | 51% | 23% | |
| 3 | SHERWOOD Dominic | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% |
| 3 | UKOLOV Dimitri | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
| 5 | FREDERIKSEN Elijah L. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 6 | DAVIES Morgan | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 39% | 17% |
| 7 | HANXU Richard A. | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 9% |
| 8 | SHAH S Ayush | 1% | 16% | 51% | 28% | 4% | |
| 9 | MARTIN Nathan C. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% |
| 10 | WANG William | 1% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 11 | NESTEROV Andrew E. | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 12 | VISURAKAPALLI Sathvik | - | 5% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 6% |
| 13 | MARTIN Liam N. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 14 | GLECKNER Aidan | 7% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 15 | KENT Matthew | 46% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 16 | BARTCH Ethan L. | 11% | 50% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 17 | FREDERIKSEN Ean L. | - | 2% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 11% |
| 18 | THACKER William O. | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 19 | HERMANSON David B. | 8% | 56% | 30% | 5% | - | |
| 20 | HONG James | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 21 | MARTYNIUK Nathaniel | 67% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 22 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | 4% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 23 | HUGHES Mason | 80% | 19% | 1% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.