Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KIM Minwook | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 36% |
| 2 | SHI Andrew | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 42% | ||
| 3 | MOLINA Nicholas (Nico) G. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 9% |
| 3 | LIN William | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 24% | |
| 5 | MOSKOWITZ Mason C. | - | - | 5% | 25% | 45% | 24% | |
| 6 | MORRILL Justin | - | 4% | 21% | 41% | 29% | 6% | |
| 7 | GHOSH Tuhin | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 17% | |
| 8 | CZAHA Balint | - | - | 6% | 27% | 44% | 23% | |
| 9 | NADILE Henry V. | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 31% | 62% |
| 10 | MORRILL William | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 40% | 13% | |
| 11 | BASALYGA Jeffrey | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% | |
| 12 | ALKEMPER Tristan H. | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
| 13 | KOGAN Benjamin | - | 8% | 35% | 45% | 12% | ||
| 14 | CHO Brandon | - | - | 4% | 23% | 45% | 27% | |
| 15 | LAU Jeremy Y. | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 41% | 17% | |
| 16 | PETRAMALE Samuel J. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 1% |
| 17 | QIN Alexander | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 18 | VAULES Charles W. | - | 4% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 6% | |
| 19 | KEEFE Duncan | - | 5% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 7% | |
| 20 | EPSTEIN Henry N. | 1% | 8% | 31% | 40% | 18% | 3% | |
| 21 | SPOSATO Andrew P. | 1% | 11% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 2% | |
| 22 | TEVEBAUGH Andrew | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 23 | TANG Albert | 5% | 25% | 43% | 24% | 3% | ||
| 24 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 25 | BOURGHOL Matthew | 8% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 26 | SRINIVAS Manu | 3% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 27 | DA GRACA Aidan | 2% | 17% | 43% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
| 28 | FIELDS Matthew S. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 29 | BUCCINO George | 42% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 30 | WALKER Robert Connor | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
| 31 | VAROQUA Tolby | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | PANDEY Neil | 18% | 44% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | CHERNAEV Aleksandar | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 34 | KESSLER Josh | 47% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 35 | GEORGE Daniel | 25% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | BURDAN Gabriel | 34% | 45% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 37 | HUANG Tyler T. | 20% | 49% | 26% | 5% | - | ||
| 38 | NEVILLE James | 14% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 39 | YASAN Anthony | 21% | 43% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | MAKLIN Edward P. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 41 | ZHANG Yankun | 22% | 48% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 42 | SAINT-HILAIRE URBINA Julian | 28% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | ||
| 43 | ROSEN Ben | 22% | 52% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.