Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KIM Minwook | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 36% |
2 | SHI Andrew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% | ||
3 | MOLINA Nicholas (Nico) G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 41% | 9% |
3 | LIN William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 24% | |
5 | MOSKOWITZ Mason C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 24% | |
6 | MORRILL Justin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 35% | 6% | |
7 | GHOSH Tuhin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 17% | |
8 | CZAHA Balint | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 23% | |
9 | NADILE Henry V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 62% |
10 | MORRILL William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% | 13% | |
11 | BASALYGA Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 37% | |
12 | ALKEMPER Tristan H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 15% | 1% |
13 | KOGAN Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 92% | 56% | 12% | ||
14 | CHO Brandon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 27% | |
15 | LAU Jeremy Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% | 17% | |
16 | PETRAMALE Samuel J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 1% |
17 | QIN Alexander | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 4% | - |
18 | VAULES Charles W. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 33% | 6% | |
19 | KEEFE Duncan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 7% | |
20 | EPSTEIN Henry N. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 60% | 20% | 3% | |
21 | SPOSATO Andrew P. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 15% | 2% | |
22 | TEVEBAUGH Andrew | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - |
23 | TANG Albert | 100% | 95% | 71% | 28% | 3% | ||
24 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | 100% | 77% | 38% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
25 | BOURGHOL Matthew | 100% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | |
26 | SRINIVAS Manu | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
27 | DA GRACA Aidan | 100% | 98% | 81% | 38% | 9% | 1% | |
28 | FIELDS Matthew S. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
29 | BUCCINO George | 100% | 58% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
30 | WALKER Robert Connor | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 1% |
31 | VAROQUA Tolby | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
32 | PANDEY Neil | 100% | 82% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | |
33 | CHERNAEV Aleksandar | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
34 | KESSLER Josh | 100% | 53% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
35 | GEORGE Daniel | 100% | 75% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
36 | BURDAN Gabriel | 100% | 66% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
37 | HUANG Tyler T. | 100% | 80% | 31% | 5% | - | ||
38 | NEVILLE James | 100% | 86% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | |
39 | YASAN Anthony | 100% | 79% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
40 | MAKLIN Edward P. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
41 | ZHANG Yankun | 100% | 78% | 30% | 5% | - | - | |
42 | SAINT-HILAIRE URBINA Julian | 100% | 72% | 28% | 5% | - | ||
43 | ROSEN Ben | 100% | 78% | 26% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.