Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LU Elaine | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 38% | 50% |
| 2 | MARYASH Samantha | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% | |
| 3 | FEIG Sela | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% | |
| 3 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% | |
| 5 | FLATT Sophia | 1% | 13% | 36% | 35% | 13% | 2% | |
| 6 | DAI Olivia | 4% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 7 | NATH Trisha | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 40% | |
| 8 | JEONG Katie | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% | |
| 9 | FESTA Carina | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 40% | 14% | |
| 10 | XU ALINA | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | |
| 11 | DONG Angel | - | 4% | 27% | 43% | 23% | 3% | |
| 12 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% | |
| 13 | ZHENG Valentina | - | 4% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 6% | |
| 14 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | |
| 15 | LI Alexis | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 16 | NAYAK Esha | 9% | 37% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 17 | KHAN Alissa | - | 3% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 7% | |
| 18 | ALTIRS Kate | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 4% |
| 19 | BOLT-TURNER Carmen | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 26% | |
| 20 | MUND Ruth | 13% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 21 | MAKLIN Sofia | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 12% | |
| 22 | LOPEZ-ONA Mia | - | 4% | 20% | 41% | 28% | 6% | |
| 23 | CHIARELLI Valentina | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 21% | |
| 24 | MALEK Zolie | 3% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 25 | LIM Alexa J. | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 26 | KNOBEL Sophia | 15% | 42% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | YU Abriella R. | 2% | 15% | 38% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
| 28 | LOO Kaitlyn | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% | |
| 29 | SHUMAKIN Alisa | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 30 | LIU Yifei | 25% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | LAGOON Miriam | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 32 | TING Sydney | 35% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 33 | WU Allison Y. | 3% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
| 34 | BONFILI Clara | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 17% | 2% | |
| 35 | PROZUMENT Elizabeth | 44% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 36 | SRINATH Lyra A. | 24% | 43% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | SONG Isabelle | 15% | 40% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | HORVITZ Jacqueline | 36% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | |
| 39 | BUSH Bethany | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 40 | MAGITSKY Leila | 9% | 32% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 41 | CHO Audrey | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 42 | FRY Daria | 42% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 43 | LIU Chenxin | 7% | 31% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.