Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 39% | 51% |
2 | SOLDATOVA Maria | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% |
3 | ZHENG Julie | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 39% | |
3 | ORVANANOS Anice | - | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 69% |
5 | AMR HOSSNY Sara | - | - | - | 5% | 32% | 63% | |
6 | KOKES Gwendolen | - | - | - | - | 6% | 34% | 60% |
7 | CASCONE Emily | - | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 41% | 11% |
8 | YANG Iris | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 50% | 13% | |
9 | CHOW Annabelle | - | - | 4% | 21% | 42% | 28% | 5% |
9 | CHEN Renee | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
11 | HOU Wendong | - | - | 2% | 11% | 34% | 42% | 10% |
12 | YURKOVA Mariia | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% |
13 | NULAND Zoe | 4% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 5% | - | |
14 | ZHOU Catherine | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 37% | 6% |
15 | ZHOU Sophia | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
16 | PAULUS Sloane | 8% | 35% | 39% | 16% | 2% | - | |
17 | WEI Angela | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
18 | DEVLIN Xeta | - | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% | |
19 | RHEE-ALBRECHT Kaya | 2% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 11% | 1% | - |
20 | BADLANI Diya | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
21 | KASHYAP Sana | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
22 | TANG Sophia | 6% | 33% | 39% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
23 | CHEN Thea | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
24 | FORNES Jolie A. | 1% | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
25 | BERGEL Daphne | 12% | 41% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - | |
26 | SHIM Grace | 1% | 8% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 3% | |
27 | PEVZNER Nicole | 16% | 41% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
28 | COHEN-RAYMOND Beatrix | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
29 | JIANG Claire | 2% | 17% | 40% | 33% | 8% | - | |
30 | SHEN Emilia | - | 4% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 5% | |
31 | KEM Madeleine | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
32 | ROSENBERG Danielle | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
33 | DALBERG Meadow | 54% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
34 | WANG Reese | 3% | 22% | 41% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
35 | YANG Emma | 1% | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
36 | WANG Rachael | 15% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
37 | MINGORANCE Elena | 3% | 25% | 43% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
38 | DALBERG Violet | 59% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
39 | ZHANG Ivy | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
40 | SCHULTZ Norah | 34% | 44% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.