Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | CHO Rebecca H. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 2 | SOLDATOVA Maria | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 3 | ZHENG Julie | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 3 | ORVANANOS Anice | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
| 5 | AMR HOSSNY Sara | V V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 6 | KOKES Gwendolen | V D V V V V | V V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
| 7 | CASCONE Emily | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 8 | YANG Iris | V V V D V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 9 | CHOW Annabelle | V D V D V V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 9 | CHEN Renee | V D V D V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 11 | HOU Wendong | D V V D V V | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 12 | YURKOVA Mariia | V V D D V V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 13 | NULAND Zoe | D D V V V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 14 | ZHOU Catherine | D V V D V D | V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
| 15 | ZHOU Sophia | D D V V V D | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 16 | PAULUS Sloane | V D D V D | V V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 17 | WEI Angela | V V D V V V | D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 18 | DEVLIN Xeta | V V D V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 19 | RHEE-ALBRECHT Kaya | V D D V V V | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 20 | BADLANI Diya | V V V V D D | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 21 | KASHYAP Sana | D V D V V V | D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 22 | TANG Sophia | D V V D V D | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 23 | CHEN Thea | D V D V D V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 24 | FORNES Jolie A. | V D V V D D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 25 | BERGEL Daphne | D D V V D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 26 | SHIM Grace | D V D D V | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 27 | PEVZNER Nicole | V V D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 28 | COHEN-RAYMOND Beatrix | V D V D D D | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 29 | JIANG Claire | D V D D D | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 30 | SHEN Emilia | D D V D D | V D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 31 | KEM Madeleine | D D D V D D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 32 | ROSENBERG Danielle | D V D D D D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 33 | DALBERG Meadow | V D D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 34 | WANG Reese | D D V D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 35 | YANG Emma | D D D V D D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 36 | WANG Rachael | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 37 | MINGORANCE Elena | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 38 | DALBERG Violet | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 39 | ZHANG Ivy | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 40 | SCHULTZ Norah | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.