Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LILOV Neil | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 32% | 60% |
2 | MORRILL Justin | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% |
3 | LEVIN Mark A. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% | |
3 | MORRILL William | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 44% | 29% |
5 | YEN Preston | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% |
6 | GHOSH Tuhin | - | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 15% |
7 | ALKEMPER Tristan H. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
8 | HO Kaden M. | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 4% |
9 | HONG Vincent Q. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 32% | 9% |
10 | KEEFE Duncan | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% |
11 | CHO Brandon | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
12 | DENG Andrew | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% | |
13 | NOBLE Colin | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
14 | FLOT Tai A. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% |
15 | GARCIA Ryan | 4% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
16 | YUAN Kevin | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% | |
17 | MOSZCZYNSKI Adam | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 47% |
18 | MARGULIES William | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
19 | EDELMAN Seth A. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
20 | SHTEYN Mark | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
21 | SHOMAN Zachary | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
22 | SHIRPAL Oleksandr | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
23 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
24 | SHOMAN Noah | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 9% | |
25 | ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
26 | ZHENG Edward L. | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
27 | WAXLER Seth B. | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
28 | GEORGE Daniel | 18% | 41% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
29 | WANG Charles | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 13% | 1% |
30 | BERMAN Luca | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
30 | PANDEY Neil | 1% | 11% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - |
32 | FISK Ethan | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 6% | - | |
33 | SKINNER Graham B. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 34% | |
34 | KUSHKOV Veniamin | - | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 45% | 16% |
35 | KOGAN Benjamin | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 43% | 18% | |
36 | BOURGHOL Matthew | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
37 | SAVOY Luca | 1% | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - |
38 | COOK Aidan J. | 30% | 44% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
39 | HUANG Tyler T. | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - |
40 | KREGER Evan | 8% | 29% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
41 | LEONARD Charles | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
42 | CHAN Alexander S. | 2% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% | |
43 | HONG Justin | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
44 | WU Wilmund | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
45 | SPOSATO Andrew P. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
46 | HAN Daniel Y. | 2% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
47 | GOLDMAN Noah R. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | - |
48 | SANDERS Samuel B. | 4% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
49 | DOLAN Charles R. | 6% | 25% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
50 | MOULTON Ian | 17% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
51 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 13% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
52 | TEWES JD | 20% | 46% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
53 | KASPER Aaron | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
54 | PILAT Matthew J. | 52% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
55 | OH Triton | - | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
56 | MAKLIN Edward P. | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
57 | PERRON Robert | 20% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
58 | BUCCINO George | 44% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
59 | GOLD Jackson | - | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
60 | SHTEIN Yan | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
61 | YURT Vehbi | 81% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
62 | HUANG Tom | 4% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
63 | FREDRICK Jameer | 24% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
64 | ZHANG Yankun | 19% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
65 | BURDAN Gabriel | 8% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
66 | VISCONTI James | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
67 | BRIDGES Benjamin | 23% | 40% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.