THRUST WINTER RYC/RJCC

Cadet Men's Saber

Sunday, February 9, 2020 at 4:00 PM

Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 LILOV Neil 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 60%
2 MORRILL Justin 100% 100% 99% 94% 74% 39% 10%
3 LEVIN Mark A. 100% 100% 100% 96% 76% 33%
3 MORRILL William 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 73% 29%
5 YEN Preston 100% 100% 100% 98% 89% 62% 22%
6 GHOSH Tuhin 100% 100% 100% 99% 88% 55% 15%
7 ALKEMPER Tristan H. 100% 100% 98% 87% 59% 24% 4%
8 HO Kaden M. 100% 100% 98% 86% 56% 22% 4%
9 HONG Vincent Q. 100% 100% 100% 97% 80% 41% 9%
10 KEEFE Duncan 100% 100% 100% 95% 78% 42% 10%
11 CHO Brandon 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 55% 17%
12 DENG Andrew 100% 99% 94% 73% 38% 9%
13 NOBLE Colin 100% 100% 97% 83% 50% 17% 2%
14 FLOT Tai A. 100% 100% 100% 96% 81% 47% 13%
15 GARCIA Ryan 100% 96% 74% 35% 9% 1%
16 YUAN Kevin 100% 100% 98% 88% 60% 20%
17 MOSZCZYNSKI Adam 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 88% 47%
18 MARGULIES William 100% 99% 88% 58% 23% 4% -
19 EDELMAN Seth A. 100% 99% 88% 59% 24% 5% -
20 SHTEYN Mark 100% 100% 99% 94% 73% 37% 8%
21 SHOMAN Zachary 100% 100% 99% 93% 73% 39% 9%
22 SHIRPAL Oleksandr 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 50% 14%
23 CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. 100% 94% 71% 36% 10% 1%
24 SHOMAN Noah 100% 100% 96% 79% 42% 9%
25 ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. 100% 100% 98% 89% 65% 30% 6%
26 ZHENG Edward L. 100% 100% 95% 75% 41% 12% 2%
27 WAXLER Seth B. 100% 100% 96% 78% 44% 13% 1%
28 GEORGE Daniel 100% 82% 42% 11% 1% -
29 WANG Charles 100% 100% 96% 80% 47% 15% 1%
30 BERMAN Luca 100% 100% 98% 87% 59% 23% 4%
30 PANDEY Neil 100% 99% 88% 54% 18% 2% -
32 FISK Ethan 100% 95% 71% 32% 7% -
33 SKINNER Graham B. 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 34%
34 KUSHKOV Veniamin 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 61% 16%
35 KOGAN Benjamin 100% 100% 99% 90% 60% 18%
36 BOURGHOL Matthew 100% 95% 73% 38% 11% 1%
37 SAVOY Luca 100% 99% 87% 54% 20% 4% -
38 COOK Aidan J. 100% 70% 27% 5% 1% - -
39 HUANG Tyler T. 100% 99% 89% 58% 21% 4% -
40 KREGER Evan 100% 92% 63% 28% 7% 1% -
41 LEONARD Charles 100% 92% 65% 29% 7% 1%
42 CHAN Alexander S. 100% 98% 86% 53% 17% 2%
43 HONG Justin 100% 79% 37% 9% 1% -
44 WU Wilmund 100% 99% 89% 58% 21% 3%
45 SPOSATO Andrew P. 100% 99% 93% 71% 36% 9% 1%
46 HAN Daniel Y. 100% 98% 76% 37% 10% 1% -
47 GOLDMAN Noah R. 100% 99% 89% 60% 24% 4% -
48 SANDERS Samuel B. 100% 96% 75% 40% 13% 2% -
49 DOLAN Charles R. 100% 94% 69% 31% 8% 1% -
50 MOULTON Ian 100% 83% 44% 12% 1% - -
51 LIU Mingyang Ryan 100% 87% 51% 18% 3% - -
52 TEWES JD 100% 80% 34% 7% 1% - -
53 KASPER Aaron 100% 97% 77% 39% 10% 1%
54 PILAT Matthew J. 100% 48% 11% 1% - -
55 OH Triton 100% 100% 95% 77% 42% 13% 2%
56 MAKLIN Edward P. 100% 100% 96% 79% 47% 16% 2%
57 PERRON Robert 100% 80% 38% 9% 1% - -
58 BUCCINO George 100% 56% 17% 3% - - -
59 GOLD Jackson 100% 100% 95% 73% 37% 10% 1%
60 SHTEIN Yan 100% 93% 66% 31% 8% 1%
61 YURT Vehbi 100% 19% 2% - - - -
62 HUANG Tom 100% 96% 74% 38% 11% 1% -
63 FREDRICK Jameer 100% 76% 33% 7% 1% - -
64 ZHANG Yankun 100% 81% 40% 11% 2% - -
65 BURDAN Gabriel 100% 92% 62% 24% 4% - -
66 VISCONTI James 100% 89% 55% 19% 3% - -
67 BRIDGES Benjamin 100% 77% 37% 10% 1% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.