San Diego, CA - San Diego, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEUNG Natalie | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% | |
| 2 | WANG Nora | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 44% | 22% | |
| 3 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 16% |
| 3 | MEHROTRA Anya | - | - | 3% | 20% | 45% | 31% | |
| 5 | WU Amelia | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 51% | 28% |
| 6 | MACHULSKY Leehi | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 45% | 37% |
| 7 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | - | - | 2% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 8 | GALLON Maya S. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 9 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 37% | 14% |
| 10 | LAN Alice S. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
| 11 | DANIEL Olivia | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 6% | |
| 12 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | - | 2% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 8% | - |
| 13 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
| 14 | ZHANG mickey | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
| 15 | JIN Jasmine | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 16 | PALMER Amelia C. | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 17 | OPERARIO Abigail Z. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 17 | CHOI Eunice | - | 6% | 28% | 41% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 19 | PECK Maia A. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 35% |
| 20 | RUSSELL Alison | 16% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 21 | RODARTE Angelina | 34% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 22 | LAVERY Chloe K. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 23 | SIVAGAR Fiona | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 24 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
| 25 | SON Katherine (Injee) | 1% | 8% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 26 | LABRACHE Ella P. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 45% | 21% |
| 27 | GREGSTON Lailia B. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 28 | FELAND Alexandra | 4% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 29 | JEAN Olympe G. | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 30 | LO Sabrina S. | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 31 | GAURIAT Jade S. | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 33 | YIN Grace | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 34 | CHOI Grace | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | - |
| 35 | QUIN Kathleen J. | 13% | 38% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 36 | LEE Rachel | 2% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
| 37 | PEHLIVANI Zara | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
| 38 | KAUSHISH Sara | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 39 | QURESHI Nisa | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 40 | BRYANT Michelle | 55% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 41 | NGUYEN Tallulah | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 42 | KIM Jayna | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 43 | BURCHETT Victoria | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 44 | HABERMAN Hailey | 5% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 45 | PANT Anisha | 22% | 42% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | SINHA Zara | 14% | 53% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 47 | ODOM Megan A. | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.