The Fencing Center of San Jose - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | BREWER Andrew K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% |
| 2 | HEDGES Philip | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% |
| 3 | SMAY II Joseph E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 39% | 3% |
| 3 | CAI Kevin P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 43% | 7% |
| 5 | HELGE James | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 35% |
| 6 | BECK Brian C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 30% | 4% |
| 7 | LEVITSKY Jonathan | 100% | 94% | 69% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 8 | JAIN Sarthak | 100% | 96% | 71% | 30% | 5% | - |
| 9 | NOLL Mischa (michael) | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 24% | 3% |
| 10 | ALLGEIER Peter | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 23% |
| 11 | MILLER Kevin W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 18% |
| 12 | MARIANI Lou | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 20% |
| 13 | NORTON Brendan E. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 9% |
| 14 | TARBUSKOVICH John | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 15% |
| 15 | ERIKSEN Odin F. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 16 | LOUIE Jason | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
| 17 | WONG Kevin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 46% | 9% |
| 18 | WALBERT Charlotte B. | 100% | 99% | 26% | 3% | - | - |
| 19 | LEE Kaitlyn | 100% | 82% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 20 | LIPP Robert (Bob) J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 73% | 24% | 1% |
| 21 | DYER Carson | 100% | 100% | 95% | 59% | 15% | 1% |
| 22 | JOSEPH Abey | 100% | 97% | 75% | 34% | 6% | - |
| 23 | JEFFERIES Jonathan J. | 100% | 86% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 24 | MADRID Maureen | 100% | 100% | 95% | 63% | 12% | 1% |
| 25 | OHSHIMA Saiyou | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% | 2% |
| 26 | ELANGO SriVaaikuntesh | 100% | 96% | 72% | 33% | 7% | 1% |
| 27 | HOFMAN Haejung | 100% | 73% | 26% | 3% | - | - |
| 28 | DYER C.J. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 7% | - |
| 29 | LOUIE Sarah | 100% | 69% | 15% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | AHMED Saheer | 100% | 62% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 31 | WILLEY Audrey | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 4% |
| 32 | GAUR Ishi | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 33 | ANGADALA Leela Krishna | 100% | 81% | 30% | 4% | - | - |
| 34 | COCKRELL Quintin | 100% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 35 | LEONARDINI Barry M. | 100% | 60% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 36 | SIMARD Sherrol A. | 100% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.