National Harbor, MD - National Harbor, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LUKASHENKO Darii | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 53% |
| 2 | CHEN Oscar | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% |
| 3 | WILSON Jude | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% |
| 3 | CHEN Leo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% |
| 5 | JI Cody Walter | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% |
| 6 | SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% |
| 7 | CONINE Tanner C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 24% | |
| 8 | CHEONG Heonjae | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 9% |
| 9 | BERMAN Luca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% |
| 10 | FERNANDEZ Rodrigo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% |
| 11 | KIM-COGAN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 20% |
| 12 | GINIS Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 23% |
| 13 | FLOT Tai A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 48% | 12% | |
| 14 | EICHHORN Lukas H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% |
| 15 | SHOMAN Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% |
| 16 | PANDEY Neil | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 17 | WOODWARD Connor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% |
| 18 | XU William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
| 19 | CHON Taylor A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 11% |
| 20 | SHERWOOD Hayden F. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
| 21 | DENNER Maximilian P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% |
| 22 | SIMAK Joseph P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 17% |
| 23 | HUANG Ethan F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 41% | 7% |
| 23 | BUCHMANN Finn D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 5% |
| 25 | TONG ZACHARY | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% |
| 26 | CHAN Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 18% |
| 27 | BERRIO Carter E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 11% |
| 28 | DU Gavin J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
| 29 | SHTEYN Mark | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
| 30 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 48% | 9% |
| 31 | FENG Leo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 14% | |
| 32 | HO Kaden M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 6% |
| 33 | SKINNER Graham B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% |
| 34 | BONSELL Vance | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 4% | |
| 34 | ERMAKOV Lev | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% | |
| 36 | OH Triton | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
| 37 | CHIN Matthew W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
| 38 | XUE ALEXANDER | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 54% | 13% |
| 38 | MYLEK Peter | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 58% | 25% | 5% |
| 40 | NOBLE Colin | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 41 | ZHENG Edward L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 38% | 6% |
| 42 | KEEFE Duncan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 11% | |
| 43 | RESHEIDAT Malik | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 7% | |
| 44 | LUTHRA Arjun | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 14% | |
| 45 | WAXLER Seth B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 8% |
| 45 | ZHOU Miles | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 9% |
| 47 | KIM Shaun M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 42% | 11% |
| 48 | ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
| 49 | LEE Justin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 12% |
| 50 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
| 51 | MORRILL William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 12% |
| 52 | TURCK Caspar J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 18% |
| 53 | CHANG Yufeng | 100% | 99% | 85% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 54 | PENG Bryan | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 54 | SAGARDI David | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 38% | 9% |
| 56 | VARUKATTY-GAFOOR Sohil | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 57 | COLE Alexander | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 13% | |
| 58 | BLEYMAN David | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 59 | FIELDS Matthew S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 60 | MORALES Jonathan | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 61 | HOLZ Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
| 62 | WANG Robert | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 49% | 19% | 3% |
| 63 | HOPPA Luke H. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 64 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 100% | 97% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 65 | YANG Duncan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 22% |
| 66 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 11% |
| 67 | CLYMER Lucas Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 25% | 3% |
| 68 | RUIGOMEZ Eduardo | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 69 | ZHANG Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 70 | HUANG Alexander C. | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 71 | GUZZO Vito | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 33% | 6% | |
| 72 | LINDHOLM Oliver S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 22% | |
| 73 | GHENEA George Philipe | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 28% | 4% | |
| 74 | LEE Aydan J. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% | |
| 75 | RODE Leon J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | |
| 76 | WELLS Griffin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
| 77 | WANG Charles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 32% | 5% |
| 78 | NOURELDIN Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% |
| 78 | WANG Andy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 25% | 3% |
| 80 | LEONARD Charles | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 13% | 1% |
| 81 | DENG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 82 | CHAVES Matthew J. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 83 | MAY Griffin M. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 84 | SPOSATO Andrew P. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
| 85 | CHOI Silas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 6% |
| 86 | DOLAN Charles R. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 87 | KASPER Aaron | 100% | 100% | 85% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 88 | BRIDGES Benjamin | 100% | 91% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 88 | MCCLUNG Gavin | 100% | 95% | 60% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 90 | HONG Steven | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 7% | |
| 91 | KILGALLEN William | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
| 92 | ZHANG Derek | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 93 | ETIN Ari | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 9% | |
| 94 | SANDERS Samuel B. | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 95 | MALONE Gregory D. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
| 95 | LU Caleb Q. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 95 | WANG Andrew | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 98 | YU Thomas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 14% | 1% |
| 99 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 7% | - |
| 100 | BONIFIELD Arthur G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% |
| 101 | VAUGHN Jason | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 8% | - |
| 102 | DOWNEY Baran | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 103 | PIWOWAR Alex | 100% | 85% | 50% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 104 | MARGULIES William | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 105 | BAE Jason I. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 5% |
| 106 | LIN Steve | 100% | 98% | 76% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 107 | CARTAGENA Caden A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
| 108 | SHOMAN Noah | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% | |
| 109 | YEE Evan J. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% | |
| 110 | GUAN Luke | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% | |
| 111 | GERSTMANN Max T. | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 112 | HUANG Maxwell H. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 113 | SULLIVAN Aidan J. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 114 | LIU Christopher X. | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 115 | SAVOY Luca | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 116 | SU Landon | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 3% |
| 117 | COX Luis E. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 118 | WANG Nicolas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 10% | 1% |
| 119 | GAUVEY Kieran | 100% | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 120 | THORNHILL Kwasi | 100% | 100% | 92% | 59% | 21% | 3% | |
| 121 | PERRON Robert | 100% | 89% | 28% | 4% | - | - | |
| 122 | GIANETTO Ethan K. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | |
| 123 | REN James | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 124 | ZHANG Ethan W. | 100% | 94% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 125 | CHEONG Heonjun | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 126 | WU Richard | 100% | 95% | 74% | 41% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 127 | PILLAI Jay K. | 100% | 74% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 128 | LYHUS Evan G. | 100% | 80% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 129 | HUANG Tom | 100% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 130 | ZENG Noah | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
| 131 | GOLDMAN Noah R. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 132 | ZHUANG Rayken | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 133 | LAU Justin Y. | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 134 | CHAN Aidan | 100% | 99% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 135 | HOLZ William A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 136 | BAERMAN Michael | 100% | 96% | 72% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 136 | BAGHERI Shaheen | 100% | 86% | 37% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 138 | GAO Albert | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 6% |
| 139 | DILLE Jackson K. | 100% | 99% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 140 | GILSON Lucas B. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 141 | BROU Inkosi | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 142 | TIAGI Daniel | 100% | 90% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 143 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | 100% | 80% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 144 | JORGESON Charlie | 100% | 60% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 145 | CRAIG Samuel | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 146 | VOSS Jeffer | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 147 | HEANEY Sam | 100% | 90% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 148 | SZCZESNY Mikolaj | 100% | 60% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 149 | HIREMATH Kushal | 100% | 100% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 150 | HUNG Samuel | 100% | 96% | 69% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 151 | CANNON Logan T. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 152 | LIU Lawrence | 100% | 85% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 153 | LIN Hadrian | 100% | 84% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 154 | BUKOWSKI Broghan J. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 155 | SUGIURA Samuel | 100% | 99% | 89% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 156 | ZHOU Hudson L. | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 157 | LANNAMAN Connor | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 158 | LEMPERT Adam | 100% | 98% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 159 | MOULTON Ian | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 160 | SHANKWILER Christopher | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 160 | TIAGI George | 100% | 41% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 162 | CHEN Jia Tao | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 163 | MEHTA Krish | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% | |
| 164 | DUCKETT Myles | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
| 165 | SMINK Oliver | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 165 | LIM William J. | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 167 | LARRAZOLO Vincent | 100% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 168 | FRANCOIS Alexander C. | 100% | 83% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 169 | LIGH Checed | 100% | 58% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 170 | LEE Aidan S. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 170 | CLARK Keagan | 100% | 39% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 172 | GOLD Carter | 100% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 173 | RUSSELL Clark | 100% | 5% | - | - | - | - | |
| 174 | MEYTIN Maxwell S. | 100% | 41% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 174 | HOTHA Nikhil | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 174 | BOSITA Carson | 100% | 76% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 177 | GONG Jerry | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 177 | JOYCE cameron | 100% | 42% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 179 | LAGASSE Jack T. | 100% | 22% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 180 | MAJESKI Andrew | 100% | 83% | 44% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 180 | TAUER Sam | 100% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 180 | STOLPER Max | 100% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 183 | LIU ALAN | 100% | 6% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.