National Harbor, MD - National Harbor, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KER Grace | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% |
2 | PAUL Lila | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
3 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 42% | 12% |
3 | LIU Sophie | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 7% |
5 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
6 | LU Elaine | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 29% |
7 | KIM Marley I. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
8 | XIAO julie | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
9 | LEE Hannah | - | - | 2% | 14% | 44% | 40% | |
9 | FEIG Sela | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% | |
11 | WU Helen | - | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 17% |
12 | FESTA Carina | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 4% |
13 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 39% | 23% |
14 | KOHLBERGER Noelle | - | - | 4% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 13% |
15 | HUANG Rachael | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 13% | |
16 | XU Emily T. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 39% | 17% |
17 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% | |
18 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
19 | DAI TONGXI | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 24% |
20 | MCKEE Brynnley | - | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
21 | NATH Trisha | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% | |
22 | JEONG Katie | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% | |
23 | TSUI Natalie | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 7% |
24 | DENG Brooke | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
25 | XU ALINA | 10% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
26 | WEI JoyAnn | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
27 | MURRAY Audrey A. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
28 | YOUNG Audrey | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% | |
29 | CHOU Amy R. | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
30 | SO Catelyn | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 25% | 5% |
31 | DHAR Layla | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
32 | KRIVOSHEEV Alexandra | < 1% | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 11% |
33 | YANG Lea | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 9% | |
34 | SCHAIBLE Sofia L. | - | 2% | 12% | 27% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
35 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | - | 1% | 6% | 29% | 45% | 19% | |
36 | MARYASH Samantha | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
37 | ZHANG Sophie | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
38 | ZHOU Ruoxi ( Jasmine) | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
39 | WUNNAVA Ellora | 24% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
40 | LOPEZ-ONA Mia | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 27% | 5% | |
41 | MYAT Chloe | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% | |
42 | CHEN Kevy | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% | |
43 | DANTULURI Shalini | 9% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
44 | MONTORIO Lily M. | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
45 | CANSECO Carly | 14% | 33% | 32% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
46 | BUSH Bethany | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
47 | DAI Olivia | 1% | 11% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - |
48 | CAO Sophie | 41% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
49 | BELEV Christa | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | |
50 | BRIATORE Francesca | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
51 | SENOGLU Irmak | - | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 6% |
52 | DEHON Inès | 1% | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - |
53 | HENRY Soraya S. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
54 | HOWARD Veronica | 20% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
54 | WU Yuwei | 1% | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
56 | LOO Kaitlyn | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
57 | KALINICHENKO Yekaterina | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
58 | BERMAN greta | - | 6% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 4% | |
59 | BUSH Divina | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
60 | FOWLER Amaia | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | |
61 | CHAN Jolene | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
62 | CHIARELLI Valentina | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
63 | HAMMERSTROM Aria | 8% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
64 | HUANG Doris | 4% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
65 | LATYSHAVA Stephanie | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | |
66 | DIECK Miranda P. | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
67 | NAYAK Esha | 15% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
68 | POLSTON Ella | - | 3% | 19% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
69 | NEUMAN Ella | 4% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
70 | KHOST Maeve | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
71 | LI Alexis | 15% | 35% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
72 | MUND Ruth | 34% | 41% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
73 | CHO Audrey | 7% | 32% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - | |
74 | HSU leah | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
75 | CHAN Madeleine V. | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
76 | CHEN Elaine | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
77 | TING Sydney | 21% | 47% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
78 | LEE Tammy | 45% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
79 | HOLTSBERG Ava | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
80 | COLLINS Margaret L. | 7% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 6% | - | |
81 | CHO Kaeli M. | 3% | 52% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
81 | WANG Callie | 16% | 35% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
83 | PALMIERI Giuliana M. | 17% | 50% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
84 | DANTULURI Shivani | 13% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
85 | FERNANDEZ Martina | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
86 | FLEEGER Sophia | 6% | 51% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.