National Harbor, MD - National Harbor, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HUANG Alex F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% |
2 | ANTHONY Devyn V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 40% |
3 | CARRINGTON IV William T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 37% |
3 | JOO Jeein | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% |
5 | PATEL Rayn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
6 | BONETTI Brayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 27% |
7 | MEHAN Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% |
8 | ANDRES Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 14% |
9 | BELL III Alfred (Tripp) R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
10 | VAID Luke | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 17% | 2% |
11 | KIM Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 17% |
12 | ERMAKOV Semeon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 24% |
13 | FADEL Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 8% |
14 | PEREIRA Beckham | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 3% |
15 | WANG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 13% |
16 | LIU Ryan | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 13% | 1% | - |
17 | ALAVE Kyle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 55% | 9% | |
18 | HOLZ Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 7% |
19 | CLARK Aram | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 41% | 9% |
20 | CRAIG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
21 | CHON Collin | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - |
22 | LIU Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% | |
23 | OH Aster | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
24 | MORGAN Abrahm H. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
25 | KANG evan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
26 | NARDINI Nathanael P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 7% |
27 | LIU Marvin | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
28 | LIN Philip T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 46% | 8% | |
29 | LIU Victor | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 3% |
30 | MALDARI Luke | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
31 | GUREVICH Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 6% | - |
32 | SUN Andrew | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
33 | URSU Marcel T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 28% |
34 | SANTOS Theodore | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
35 | HALL Noah | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
36 | HONG Jaden | 100% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
37 | WAXLER Ryan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 5% | - |
38 | WANG Max | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 16% | 2% |
39 | HU Andrew | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
40 | GUZZO Delano | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 58% | 25% | 5% |
41 | LOO Jason | 100% | 94% | 65% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
42 | FEI Danny | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
43 | LIU Aaron | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 8% | - |
44 | GONG Gavin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
45 | MCDONALD Finn | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
46 | ZHANG Ray | 100% | 77% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
47 | JOHNSON Leland | 100% | 82% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
48 | SARWAHI Viraat | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
49 | KIM Samuel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 4% |
49 | SMITH Jacob | 100% | 92% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
51 | BREUER Daniel | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
52 | HU Harry | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 20% | 2% |
53 | MAWLER malcolm | 100% | 91% | 54% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
54 | CHEN timothy | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
55 | DOSTAL Maximilian | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - |
56 | MELUL Jonathan | 100% | 61% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
57 | WEI Rian | 100% | 95% | 67% | 21% | 3% | - | |
58 | XU Ivan | 100% | 77% | 27% | 3% | - | - | |
59 | SO Preston | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
60 | JUNG Ethan | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
61 | YOOK Isaac | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 3% |
62 | SMITH Christopher | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - |
63 | SHUKLA Jai | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
64 | LEE Ezra | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
65 | WOLITZER Gage | 100% | 93% | 59% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
66 | LEE Alexander | 100% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
67 | HONG David | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
68 | CHANG Timothy | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 8% | 1% |
69 | TSAO Alister | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
70 | FENG Brendan | 100% | 57% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
71 | ZHAO David | 100% | 60% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
72 | KARAVAS Nicholas | 100% | 88% | 51% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
73 | BOSITA Brennan | 100% | 93% | 67% | 33% | 10% | 2% | - |
74 | WANG Justin | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
75 | LEE Gordon | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
76 | BITKOWER Max | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.