National Harbor, MD - National Harbor, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HUSISIAN Hadley N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% |
2 | JOYCE Michaela | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 89% |
3 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 40% |
3 | TYLER Syd | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% |
5 | MAO Amy | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
6 | ZHANG Tina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% |
7 | KIM Elizabeth Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 8% |
8 | NGUYEN Kira | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 19% | 2% |
9 | SMITH Grace L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 15% |
10 | CHENG Ava | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
11 | GU Sarah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 25% |
12 | SEMIKIN Julia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% |
13 | HENRY Asha S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% |
13 | XUAN Nicole J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 33% | 6% |
15 | ZAFFT Tatiana M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% |
16 | DESAI Meera P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 11% |
17 | JAKEL Sophia N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% |
18 | RICHARDSON Lauren C. | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
19 | HSU Adele Y. | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | < 1% | - |
20 | LI Alisha | 100% | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - |
21 | SUN XiaoQi (Angelica) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 27% |
22 | LEE kyungmin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 32% |
23 | LUO Ashley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 14% |
24 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 14% | 1% |
25 | ALEXANDROV Katherine S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 22% | 2% |
26 | BELSLEY Devon K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 8% |
27 | BLIN Margaux J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
28 | PAPADAKIS Lily | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% |
29 | WITTE Vera | 100% | 97% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
30 | MING Cynthia | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 6% | - |
31 | KIM Erika S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
32 | DE JAGER Celine | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
33 | REMEZA Alissa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 15% |
34 | PALANSKI Cate | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 6% |
34 | FLO Sena | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - |
36 | REID Anousheh | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 7% |
37 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
38 | LOWENSTEIN Penelope J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 43% | 3% |
39 | GAO Judy | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
40 | CALDERA Lexi I. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 6% |
41 | LI Yuhe | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% |
42 | CHAN Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 12% |
43 | HARJANI Meher | 100% | 97% | 75% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - |
44 | JOSEPH mikayla | 100% | 99% | 85% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - |
45 | JOYAL Anne-Sophie | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% | 8% | - |
46 | REITINGER Emilie B. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
46 | BENZAN India | 100% | 97% | 66% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
48 | ZENG Katrina | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 13% | 1% |
49 | PEELER Julia | 100% | 99% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - |
50 | MCLAREN Rachel | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - |
51 | SMITH Myah | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 14% | 1% |
52 | BAJAJ Nikita K. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 9% | - |
53 | GLICK Nina | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
54 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 11% |
55 | LEE Yedda | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 4% |
55 | TEJADA Mikaela Aprille S. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
57 | DILLE Carolina G. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
58 | FAZZINI Angelina | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
59 | CHERNYSHOVA Victoria | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 3% |
60 | RAUSCH Juliana | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - |
61 | HOSANAGAR Inchara | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
62 | YOON Katherine | 100% | 88% | 51% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
63 | OGAWA Kaylin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
64 | ALEXANDER Amelia | 100% | 77% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
65 | MOON Seojung | 100% | 86% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
66 | LU Samantha R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 20% | 2% |
67 | PRIHODKO Nina | 100% | 96% | 71% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
68 | YAO KATHARINE | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
69 | MACEDON Gianna | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
70 | PAYNE Elizabeth | 100% | 91% | 54% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
71 | LOUGHLIN Ariana | 100% | 94% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
72 | KEE Bea Isabelle | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
73 | LI Suri | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
74 | KRUMHOLZ Nicole | 100% | 60% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
75 | KRUPENKO Sabrina R. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
75 | HU Chelsea | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 1% | - |
77 | NIEMAN Anjolie | 100% | 91% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
78 | NIEMAN Aubrey | 100% | 80% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
78 | PAN Iris | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
78 | ROMERO KURI Celeste | 100% | 57% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
81 | LIU Sydney | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
81 | RAVIKUMAR Varsha | 100% | 78% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
83 | RAI Ananya | 100% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
84 | WAGMAN Agatha E. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
85 | NAYAK Mira | 100% | 80% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
86 | WONG Bella | 100% | 82% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
87 | BROWN Hannah | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
88 | PANKOW Caroline | 100% | 84% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
89 | OHL Emily | 100% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
89 | FRIEDMAN Zoe | 100% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
91 | DREFKE Sigrid | 100% | 65% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.