Manalapan, NJ - Manalapan, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | SHOMAN Noah | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
2 | EPSTEIN Oliver D. | V D V D V | V V V V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
3 | NG Jeremiah | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
3 | BLEYMAN David | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
5 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | V V V V V | V V D | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
6 | SAVOY Luca | V V V V D | V V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
7 | DOLAN Charles R. | V V V V D | V V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
8 | CHTERENTAL Alex | V D V D V | V V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
9 | SHOMAN Zachary | V V V V V D | V V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
10 | MCCARTHY Devan | V V V V D | V V D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
11 | GIZERSKY Jared | V V D V V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
12 | KANAGALA Anagh | V V V D V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
13 | GILSON Lucas B. | V V D V V D | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
14 | LEONARD Charles | D V D V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
15 | HOPPA Luke H. | V V D V D V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
16 | ZHUANG Rayken | V V D D V | V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
17 | PRIMUS Nazir | V V V D V V | D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
18 | MOULTON Ian | V V V V D V | D | 2.4 | 5 | +2.6 |
19 | BUCHMANN Finn D. | V V V V D V | V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
20 | FIELDS Matthew S. | D V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
20 | CADAMBI Roshan | D V V V V | V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
22 | BROU Inkosi | V V V V D | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
23 | KILGALLEN William | V V D V V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
24 | SHUKUL Arhan | D D V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
25 | PILAT Matthew J. | V D V V V D | V D | 1.7 | 4 | +2.3 |
26 | WANG Robert | D D V V V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
27 | HUANG Alexander C. | V D V D V | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
28 | POSY Daniel | D D V V V | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
29 | OKEEFE Mitchell | V V D D V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
30 | HUANG Tom | D V D V V D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
31 | LEMPERT Adam | D V V D D V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
32 | MICLAUS Justin | D D D V D D | V D | 3.6 | 1 | -2.6 |
33 | TIAGI Daniel | D D V V V V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
34 | BERA Enzo | D V V D D V | D | 4.8 | 3 | -1.8 |
35 | HUROWITZ Max | V V D D V D | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
36 | SHI Erick | D V D V D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
37 | ALTIRS Giorgio | V V D D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
38 | HUANG Connor | D V D V D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
39 | CHEN Evan P. | V D D D D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
39 | CHUANG Tristan | D D D V V D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
41 | DEPEW Spencer | D D V D D V | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
42 | UH Daniel | D D V D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
43 | VOSS Jeffer | D D D D V | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
44 | PERRON Robert | D D D D V | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
45 | GOLD Carter | D D D V D | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
46 | FRANCOIS Alexander C. | V D D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
47 | ONG Chinli | D D D V D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
48 | LAU Justin Y. | D D D D D V | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
49 | STERN Tobias | D D D D D V | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
50 | SUGIURA Samuel | D D V D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
51 | GLOZMAN Justin | V D D D D D | D | 3.3 | 1 | -2.3 |
52 | SEN David | D V D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
53 | IDRISSI Idris | D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
54 | CAMPO Alexander P. | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
55 | NEUMANN-LORECK Oliver | D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
56 | SZCZESNY Mikolaj | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
57 | YANG Kevin | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
57 | RAY Arjun | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.