Manalapan, NJ - Manalapan, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHOMAN Noah | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 43% | 24% |
| 2 | EPSTEIN Oliver D. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
| 3 | NG Jeremiah | - | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 16% |
| 3 | BLEYMAN David | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 15% | |
| 5 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 2% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
| 6 | SAVOY Luca | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 43% | 16% | |
| 7 | DOLAN Charles R. | - | 7% | 31% | 43% | 17% | 2% | |
| 8 | CHTERENTAL Alex | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% | |
| 9 | SHOMAN Zachary | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 48% |
| 10 | MCCARTHY Devan | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | - | |
| 11 | GIZERSKY Jared | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% | |
| 12 | KANAGALA Anagh | - | - | 2% | 15% | 46% | 37% | |
| 13 | GILSON Lucas B. | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 4% |
| 14 | LEONARD Charles | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 15 | HOPPA Luke H. | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% |
| 16 | ZHUANG Rayken | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 17% | 3% | |
| 17 | PRIMUS Nazir | 1% | 5% | 19% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 18 | MOULTON Ian | 2% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 19 | BUCHMANN Finn D. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 17% |
| 20 | FIELDS Matthew S. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% | |
| 20 | CADAMBI Roshan | 3% | 20% | 41% | 29% | 7% | - | |
| 22 | BROU Inkosi | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% | |
| 23 | KILGALLEN William | - | 5% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
| 24 | SHUKUL Arhan | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 25 | PILAT Matthew J. | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 26 | WANG Robert | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 44% | 21% | |
| 27 | HUANG Alexander C. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 40% | |
| 28 | POSY Daniel | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 29 | OKEEFE Mitchell | 1% | 28% | 42% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 30 | HUANG Tom | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 31 | LEMPERT Adam | 2% | 14% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 32 | MICLAUS Justin | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 4% |
| 33 | TIAGI Daniel | 1% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 34 | BERA Enzo | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 23% |
| 35 | HUROWITZ Max | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 36 | SHI Erick | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 37 | ALTIRS Giorgio | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 38 | HUANG Connor | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
| 39 | CHEN Evan P. | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 39 | CHUANG Tristan | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 41 | DEPEW Spencer | 1% | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 42 | UH Daniel | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 43 | VOSS Jeffer | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 44 | PERRON Robert | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 45 | GOLD Carter | 68% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 46 | FRANCOIS Alexander C. | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - | |
| 47 | ONG Chinli | 31% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 48 | LAU Justin Y. | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 49 | STERN Tobias | 6% | 40% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | SUGIURA Samuel | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 51 | GLOZMAN Justin | - | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 52 | SEN David | 43% | 40% | 14% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 53 | IDRISSI Idris | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 54 | CAMPO Alexander P. | 18% | 43% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 55 | NEUMANN-LORECK Oliver | 4% | 27% | 46% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 56 | SZCZESNY Mikolaj | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 57 | YANG Kevin | 25% | 39% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 57 | RAY Arjun | 60% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.