San Diego, CA - San Diego, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SOOD Ishani S. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 38% | 15% |
| 2 | KONG Chin-Yi | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | |
| 3 | OH Erin H. | 9% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 3 | ZHANG Sylvia | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% | |
| 5 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 8% | |
| 6 | KIM Katherine | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 1% |
| 7 | KOROL Dana | - | 3% | 12% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 8 | DUAN Konnie | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 9 | CHO Cameron S. | - | 4% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 4% |
| 10 | LOCKE Savannah | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 34% | 8% | |
| 11 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% | |
| 12 | PANT Anisha | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 42% | 34% |
| 13 | PENG Amber L. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
| 14 | KHOO Lauren A. | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% | |
| 15 | TAKAGI Hikaru G. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 41% | |
| 16 | TAN Clarisse | 1% | 8% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 17 | WADHWANI Liana A. | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% | |
| 18 | LEE Isabelle | 1% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
| 19 | CHO Gracie L. | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
| 20 | LAU Chloe M. | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% | |
| 21 | KOROL Neta | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 22 | CHUNG Jaein | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 43% | 7% | |
| 23 | PRIETO Sofia M. | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - | |
| 24 | FERNANDES Thea | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 4% |
| 25 | KALE Anika A. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 45% | 37% | |
| 26 | DING Abigail | 1% | 15% | 38% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
| 27 | YEN Natalie | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 43% | 28% | |
| 28 | HWANG Jungmin | 12% | 36% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 30 | MORADI Raiyan N. | 1% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | |
| 31 | WANDJI Anais | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | |
| 32 | HO Rachel E. | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 33 | SHIH Diane | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 34 | KIM Hyunchae Y. | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | |
| 35 | TOM Caitlyn | - | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% | |
| 36 | RANDOLPH Piper | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 37 | SU Alena J. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% | |
| 38 | SUN Chien-Yu | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
| 39 | MITLOFF Allison | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 40 | WELBORN Calissa | 30% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | KOSLOW Amicie | - | 4% | 16% | 30% | 30% | 16% | 3% |
| 42 | VALDEZ Hannah M. | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 43 | SUN Ruoxi | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | |
| 44 | HSIUNG Samantha | 57% | 36% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 45 | LAI Evelyn | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 46 | SHUM Elizabeth | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 47 | LUO Sandra J. | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 48 | SAAVEDRA Ana | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 49 | NAM Cassie | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 50 | DANG Elizabeth H. | 8% | 29% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 51 | BRAUNSCHWEIG Lucille J. | 10% | 28% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 52 | PENTSAKOV Margaret | 33% | 42% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | UMAP Arna | 11% | 38% | 37% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 54 | CUI Amy | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | |
| 55 | LEE Samantha X. | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 56 | DO Leila | 8% | 34% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 57 | GONG Chloe | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.