San Diego, CA - San Diego, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SOOD Ishani S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 15% |
| 2 | KONG Chin-Yi | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% | |
| 3 | OH Erin H. | 100% | 91% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 3 | ZHANG Sylvia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% | |
| 5 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 8% | |
| 6 | KIM Katherine | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 1% |
| 7 | KOROL Dana | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 58% | 25% | 5% |
| 8 | DUAN Konnie | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
| 9 | CHO Cameron S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 53% | 22% | 4% |
| 10 | LOCKE Savannah | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 8% | |
| 11 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 6% | |
| 12 | PANT Anisha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 34% |
| 13 | PENG Amber L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 56% | 18% |
| 14 | KHOO Lauren A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 9% | |
| 15 | TAKAGI Hikaru G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% | |
| 16 | TAN Clarisse | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
| 17 | WADHWANI Liana A. | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 2% | |
| 18 | LEE Isabelle | 100% | 99% | 85% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
| 19 | CHO Gracie L. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% | |
| 20 | LAU Chloe M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 22% | |
| 21 | KOROL Neta | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 22 | CHUNG Jaein | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% | 7% | |
| 23 | PRIETO Sofia M. | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 24 | FERNANDES Thea | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
| 25 | KALE Anika A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 37% | |
| 26 | DING Abigail | 100% | 99% | 83% | 45% | 12% | 1% | |
| 27 | YEN Natalie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 28% | |
| 28 | HWANG Jungmin | 100% | 88% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 30 | MORADI Raiyan N. | 100% | 99% | 82% | 45% | 13% | 2% | |
| 31 | WANDJI Anais | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 9% | |
| 32 | HO Rachel E. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
| 33 | SHIH Diane | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 34 | KIM Hyunchae Y. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | |
| 35 | TOM Caitlyn | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 26% | 4% | |
| 36 | RANDOLPH Piper | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 37 | SU Alena J. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% | |
| 38 | SUN Chien-Yu | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 16% | 2% | |
| 39 | MITLOFF Allison | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 40 | WELBORN Calissa | 100% | 70% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | KOSLOW Amicie | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 49% | 19% | 3% |
| 42 | VALDEZ Hannah M. | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 43 | SUN Ruoxi | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 8% | |
| 44 | HSIUNG Samantha | 100% | 43% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 45 | LAI Evelyn | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 46 | SHUM Elizabeth | 100% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 47 | LUO Sandra J. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 48 | SAAVEDRA Ana | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 49 | NAM Cassie | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 50 | DANG Elizabeth H. | 100% | 92% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 51 | BRAUNSCHWEIG Lucille J. | 100% | 90% | 62% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 52 | PENTSAKOV Margaret | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | UMAP Arna | 100% | 89% | 51% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 54 | CUI Amy | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% | |
| 55 | LEE Samantha X. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 56 | DO Leila | 100% | 92% | 58% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 57 | GONG Chloe | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.